New Mandala

New perspectives on mainland Southeast Asia

New Mandala random header image

Does the punishment fit the crime?

July 27th, 2006 by Andrew Walker · 1 Comment

The debacle of Thailand’s April election has hit some people very hard. Not the government which claimed victory with over 50 percent of the vote. And not the boycotting opposition parties that claimed a moral victory with a no-vote of around 30 percent. But the three Election Commission members sentenced on Tuesday to 4 years in prison for mishandling the April 2 election have been hit very hard. They may well be regretting the day they became involved in Thailand’s messy public administration. I am in no position to comment on the rights and wrongs of their case, and there certainly are widespread concerns about some aspects of the conduct of the snap election, but a 4 year prison term seems very harsh indeed. There is widespread violation and manipulation of electoral laws by all parties in Thailand and a strong message from the criminal court about the importance of electoral integrity is desirable. But 4 years in prison? For mismanagement of an election that was sabotaged from the outset! And where the vote wasn’t even close! Seems excessive to me.

Tags: Thailand · Thaksin

1 response so far ↓

  • 1 Andrew Walker // Jul 30, 2006 at 10:43 am

    From today\\\’s Nation online:

    \”The Criminal Court has asked the Crime Suppression Division to trace the identities of those who had posted strong criticisms against the court on Web boards. Than Boonyatulanon, secretary to the Criminal Court chief justice, said he asked CSD commander Pol Maj Gen Winai Thongsong to trace the IP addresses and find who were the ones who post the comments against the court after the court found the three election commissions guilty.

    The Nation

Leave a Comment

Please note: New Mandala encourages vigorous debate. However, for the moment we will only be publishing high-quality comments that make original contributions to discussion. There will, of course, still be space for pithy, humorous, eccentric and cheeky input. Short and sweet will usually trump long and involved. Repetitive ranting, unimaginative point-scoring and idle abuse will not be entertained. Comments which carry a real name are also more likely to be approved. Thank you for your ongoing interest and contributions.

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>