Whatever you think about the politics or academic analysis of Giles Ungpakorn you have to admire his courage in fronting the first protest against the coup. Bangkok Pundit has a very useful summary of his recent (pre-coup) statements about the political situation in Thailand. And an interesting statement by Giles can be found here. I can’t resist just one quote from it:
The Thaksin government and the Thai Rak Thai Party enjoy significant support from the urban and rural poor. This is because it is the first government in decades which seeks to improve welfare and the incomes of the poor. The government introduced a universal health care system and other measures to stimulate the economy at grass roots level, all of which were attacked by neo-liberal academics and opposition parties. Of course, these “populist” policies were not paid for by progressive taxation of the rich. The government also pushed ahead with privatisation and neo-liberal Free-trade agreements. This government has also committed gross human rights abuses in the Muslim South and in its “war on drugs”.
Rather than calling for an anti-government movement which goes beyond Thaksin’s populism in order to create real income equality and a welfare state, the conservative section of the anti-government movement sees ordinary people who support Thaksin as ignorant, stupid and easily bought by the government. Thaksin has thrown down the gauntlet by dissolving parliament and calling a snap election in early April. He calls this “returning power to the people” in marked contrast to the royalists. The opposition parties have announced a boycott of the election because they know they will lose. Thaksin has responded to this by saying that if more than 50% of those who vote, register an abstention (which is possible on Thai ballot papers), he will step down. But the conservative opposition has dismissed this, claiming that much of the electorate are badly educated.










3 responses so far ↓
1 Bangkok Pundit // Sep 24, 2006 at 9:52 pm
Andrew: For me nothing beats this from the Independent:
“It’s a tale of two countries,” he said. “You have the urban middle classes and the rural poor. Thaksin was the first to really provide political programmes for the poor. There is this argument that he won elections fraudulently, but there’s no real evidence for that. I think the rural poor voted for him because he provided policies for them. That’s democracy and if you don’t like it you have to set up a political party and offer something better. In this country it’s the rural poor who respect democracy – and it’s the educated elite who don’t.”
2 New Mandala » “There was a democratic alternative to the coup” // Sep 25, 2006 at 8:47 am
[...] I have received, via forwarded email, the following statement by Giles Ji Ungpakorn who, at this stage, seems to be emerging as one of the key public intellectuals opposed to the coup. There was a democratic alternative to the coup [...]
3 Bertil Olsson // Sep 26, 2006 at 6:00 pm
Lack of logic?
1. An elected PM and his government can NOT select generals they trust? It is supposed to be undemocratic.
2. Generals can select a PM and a government and it is supposed to be democratic.
I don’t understand!
In what kind of situations, if any, can an elected government be removed by none democratic means? And why? Some guidance might be given by international laws and UN human rights declarations. But it is not related to tax violations. The democratic process has to cope with ordinary and even large forms of defective administration.
Leave a Comment
Please note: New Mandala encourages vigorous debate. However, for the moment we will only be publishing high-quality comments that make original contributions to discussion. There will, of course, still be space for pithy, humorous, eccentric and cheeky input. Short and sweet will usually trump long and involved. Repetitive ranting, unimaginative point-scoring and idle abuse will not be entertained. Comments which carry a real name are also more likely to be approved. Thank you for your ongoing interest and contributions.