A former British Ambassador to Thailand, Derek Tonkin, has written to The Times expressing his support for the coup and the ruling military junta. His letter has been picked up by The Nation. For context, some of Tonkin’s other comments in the immediate aftermath of the coup are available from BBC Radio 4.
In his letter, Tonkin writes that Thaksin’s:
…wealth has become so immense and has been used so shamelessly to undermine political opponents and critics that his position has become virtually unassailable through the ballot box. As the declared purpose of the coup is to restore democratic rights and bring an end to corrupt domination of the rural vote, is action against tyranny and for democracy not fully justified?
This final question is one that will, no doubt, prompt much gentle musing, and many books, in the years to come.
Right now, we are, however, hearing much banter about Thaksin’s supposedly “corrupt domination of the rural vote”. The realities on the ground often defy such convenient generalisation.
If we were to just listen to voices like the former Ambassador we might feel comfortable that a military junta is now in command. But just how “unassailable” is their position? With no possibility of (peaceful) popular dissent, or for naysayers to even travel around, it seems they are brooking no opposition.
The former Ambassador has been around the block. As he knows all too well, military regimes, once established, can be difficult to change. They have a habit of making themselves comfortable.
2 responses so far ↓
1 New Mandala » Recent Burma scholarship // Jun 14, 2007 at 8:23 pm
[...] his support for the military junta. An account of Tonkin’s stance on Thai politics is available from the New Mandala archives. He is now retired from the Foreign Office, serves as a Director of [...]
2 Network Myanmar // Nov 9, 2007 at 11:21 pm
[...] British Ambassador to Thailand. I mentioned Tonkin and his arguments after the coup in Thailand back in September 2006. It is also relevant that he recently published a scholarly article on Burma’s 1990 [...]
Leave a Comment
Please note: New Mandala encourages vigorous debate. However, for the moment we will only be publishing high-quality comments that make original contributions to discussion. There will, of course, still be space for pithy, humorous, eccentric and cheeky input. Short and sweet will usually trump long and involved. Repetitive ranting, unimaginative point-scoring and idle abuse will not be entertained. Comments which carry a real name are also more likely to be approved. Thank you for your ongoing interest and contributions.