Over the past two days, some papers in Australia have been awash with articles that provide information and analysis on Australian efforts to train Burmese counter-terrorism officials. For many obvious reasons this is a very sensitive topic, both in Australia and anywhere else that Burmese refugees have found sanctuary.
Greg Sheridan, The Australian’s foreign editor, has now penned an op-ed. Sheridan concludes his dull piece with the exhortation that, “Now the Burmese would like more assistance in their counter-terrorist efforts. Frankly, we’d be ill-advised to decline.”
Based on the information that Sheridan presents, many honest observers would likely conclude that “we’d be ill-advised to accept“.
On this issue, of course, there are many shades of opinion and Sheridan has certainly earned the right to express his. Unfortunately, Sheridan’s hard-man stare falters when he writes:
In the real world there is no getting away from these moral dilemmas. As one official puts it, one question has to be whether providing such training is likely to help protect Australian lives. The answer is undoubtedly yes.
This glosses over a multitude of dangerous and important questions that should be at the heart of informed analysis of any assistance to the Burma State and its henchmen. Who, for example, will the Burmese counter-terrorist officials be trained to counter? The Karen, the Rohingya, Aung San Suu Kyi? International Islamist ideologues? Inconvenient and critical local preachers?
Sheridan misses this point. He doesn’t answer these most important of questions.
Instead, Sheridan asks, “Could any of the Burmese institutions involved in learning from Australians misuse that knowledge in domestic repression?” To use Sheridan’s own phrase, “The answer is undoubtedly yes”. Using Australian taxpayers’ money in this way seems like something of a gamble. I do hope the government, and its many diligent advisors, know what they are doing. As The Australian’s headline makes clear: “Burma wants help to keep terrorists at bay”.
The questions should be - who are these “terrorists” and why should Australia be involved?
5 responses so far ↓
1 Vichai N // Oct 7, 2006 at 9:59 pm
What a silly nation Australia!
Common sense should be their guide and there would be less confusion. And an EDITOR at that . . . my my! what is the free world now going through.
2 New Mandala » Human rights in Burma // Oct 25, 2006 at 7:33 am
[...] Kinley and Wilson’s account of the human rights training program that they both helped implement is one very informative perspective on what is, obviously, a controversial Australian initiative. It is particularly noteworthy in light of the even more controversial efforts to train Burmese counter-terrorism officers about which I have previously written. [...]
3 New Mandala » Human rights under a “brutal military regime” // Oct 26, 2006 at 2:07 am
[...] The Irrawaddy has a useful report by Clive Parker that covers the arguments of the UK Conservative Party MPs who have been agitating against the Burmese junta. This Irrawaddy coverage paints an interesting picture, particularly when read in light of yesterday’s and earlier New Mandala post on the topic of Western government “engagements” with the military regime. [...]
4 Cheri Mangrai // Oct 30, 2006 at 9:36 pm
Please visit Australia based BurmaGateway and join us online. See you there.
5 Former Australian Ambassador engages Burma // Jul 29, 2008 at 5:10 pm
[...] changed a bit since September 2007). Australia has been involved in all manner of memorable “engagements” and has also sometimes taken a tougher line with the generals and their mates. Over the [...]
Leave a Comment
Please note: New Mandala encourages vigorous debate. However, for the moment we will only be publishing high-quality comments that make original contributions to discussion. There will, of course, still be space for pithy, humorous, eccentric and cheeky input. Short and sweet will usually trump long and involved. Repetitive ranting, unimaginative point-scoring and idle abuse will not be entertained. Comments which carry a real name are also more likely to be approved. Thank you for your ongoing interest and contributions.