Visitors to Buddhist festivals in Thailand are often struck by the presence of scantily clad dancing girls who, along with highly amplified bands, provide evening entertainment. This ribald behavior has come to the attention of the Queen. She has voiced concern over televised “lewd dancing” at a Buddhist festival in Nong Khai. According to the report in The Nation, the dancing featured “coyote dancers” in “provocative dresses and dancing with sexually explicit moves.” The Nation reports that “Her Majesty the Queen has issued a command cautioning over television images of female dancers in provocative dresses at a Buddhist charity session.” Her Majesty is quoted as saying:
Buddhists in general should always bear in mind what is good for the image of the country… Any shows or performances organised in association with any Buddhist festival should be held with respect for Lord Buddha and Buddhism.
The royal alarm is very understandable. On the face of it, this sort of lewd behavior hardly seems consistent with Buddhist piety. But there is, I think, something a bit more subtle going on. There is a considerable anthropological literature on the role of sexual imagery in Buddhist ritual. But there is one specific point I want to make here. Buddhist festivals are exceptional times in which certain sacred values are marked off from the mundane concerns of day-to-day life. The sacred sphere of the festival is set apart from the mundane world of the day-to-day by a range of techniques – special forms of dress, offerings, prayers, sermons, food, decoration and, of course, the provision of entertainment. This entertainment plays a crucial role in intensifying the effervescence of the sacred occasion. Scantily dressed dancing girls, given their exceptional nature, play a part in marking Buddhist festivals as times of exceptional, and sacred, assembly.
Of course there are innovations in the way this separation from the world of day-to-day pursuits is expressed (though to my untrained eye coyote dancing looks like fairly standard gyration) but it would be a mistake to think that the sacred and the lewd are a new combination. Consider this passage from Richard Davis’ classic account of northern Thai ritual (Muang Metaphysics) where he quotes from the songs that accompany the New Year rocket festival (warning, some readers may find the language offensive):
We’re not just sots showing off, so why don’t you ladies break off a tree limb and place it on the dike close-by here to sit on? Careful not to open your legs and leave those soft private parts exposed. Now don’t get the idea that we’re just drunk and saucy. We just want all you people to keep your legs together nicely. Some people just leave their cunts bare and pouting. The one with the coconut breasts says I’m handsome. She’s afraid they’re going to lift her dress and sqeeze it, those bawdy drunkards. Lord, they are a shameful bunch. And where do you live, little sister with the low strut, coming to watch the fireworks as if you were a queen? Whose little girl are you? Your big brothers have taken a liking to you and your broad bright smile. I’ve a mind to bend your neck over and give you a kiss. I only dislike breasts that droop like bee’s nests. But you, sitting there like that – Lord, I’d like to give you a hug. Great round breastrs and dark nipples. Let these reckless fellows give you a feel, inside and out. Squeeze and feel those big nipples as rough as elephan’t hide. … This is the bawdiest New Year yet. Spines bent back like lizards on the spit, brassieres barely covering the nipples. Small and trim-waisted with breasts like watermelons. (123)
Coyote dancing seems almost modest in comparison!

I saw the report but could not find any of the images or TV footage to comment on. Is that photo you published from Nong Khai?
Quality comment or not?
0
0
The photo is from my own research in northern Thailand.
Quality comment or not?
0
0
Andrew W – Have you abandoned your village research project about Thaksin Shinawatra, his Isan followers, and the Khmer voodoo powers Thaksin wields on the poor?
Thaksin giving handouts + black magic totally enthralled the Isans to Thaksin Shinawatra. That is my theory and it is up to you Andrew to disprove it.
Quality comment or not?
0
1
Who the heck is gonna go to make merit (e.g., give donations) if there aren’t any dancing girls and worldly entertainment? I’m saying this as a realist – if you take away the entertainment, the only people who will go and make donations will be old people and folks who have done some major sinning. Oh, and the royal family of course. Their generous patronage of kathin ceremonies nationwide is well documented.
Lets just hope the Queen also doesn’t see any videos about what goes on at Soprano, Forte, or Orbit. If she did, those fine places could go the way of the Sao Cheer Beer (beer waitresses in tight skirts adorned with logos of the beer companies), which have been banned by the junta. Those girls were making an honest living, and over night, their jobs were deemed illegal.
Heck, if the Queen knew what was going on Patpong and what that did to the “good for the image of the country,” we could kiss those places goodbye as well.
Quality comment or not?
2
0
Thanks for the clarification Andrew – perhaps it may be drawing a bit of a long bow to use an image taken from somewhere near Chaing Mai to represent something happening in Nong Khai. Don’t you think? So… we still don’t know what the actual behaviour was that caused offence. I was interested in seeing if it was just another morlum performance – something that you see all over the northeast that included ‘run of the mill’ hang khreuang dances or something new (perhaps ‘coyote dancers’) and ‘lurid’ that really did deserve the Queens attention (I’ll be sure to check them out too if I get the chance).
I’m probably jumping in a bit early here and could really end up with my foot in my mouth. But here goes.
There could be another explanation for the response from the Queen. It also seems to me that whenever there is any type of ‘crisis’ in Thailand it also brings on a massive crisis of identity – a crisis with the concept of ‘Thainess’ itself. There seems to be an assumption that if everybody performed like the ideal ‘Thai’ then there wouldn’t have been a crisis in the first place. I know that, in its legal sense, to be ‘Thai’ is to be a citizen of nation state of Thailand. However, and this has been pointed out by many eminent commentators, culturally ‘Thai’ stresses Siamese (or central Thai or ‘Bangkok’ or what ever you want to call them) cultural values, in terms of very narrow and specified ideas of language, monarchy, religion and state that have been promoted by so called ‘nation’ building ‘leaders’ over the last 100 or so years. And it seems to me that whenever there is a crisis the resultant return to governments of the ‘elite’, ‘strongmen’, ‘dictators’ or ‘Thai democracy’ there is a retreat to, and a renewed promotion of, these very specified ideas of ‘Thainess’. Within this understanding of being ‘Thai’ there is not much room for difference.
Patrick Jory, amongst others has argued that the process of democratisation and political decentralisation that had occurred over the last 15 years or so in Thailand had given birth to a resurgence in ethnic cultures and language. This resurgence was not only evident in so called non Tai ‘minority’ ethnic cultures but could be seen within different Tai groups as well (i.e. the Lao) One of the most visible areas of ethnic Lao cultural reassurance has been in the arts, particularly in music (Rock Sadert – a northeast version of the Warumi Band is a favourite), music performance (I would include morlum and hang khreuang dancing in this category) and flim. (Did anyone see ‘Yam Yasothorn’ last year – suitably subtitled in Thai so that the Bangkok crowd could get it). And I fear that it is this flowering of really viberant cultural production that is going to suffer now that there is a return to an absolute centralised model of power.
I wonder if this performance at Nong Khai and the Queens comments is just the start of the process of winding back difference and diversity within the new ‘democratic’ Thailand.
Quality comment or not?
1
0
Great comment Chris, and I want to take up some of these issues in relation to the ongoing discussion of “voodoo”. Will post on this soon.
My intention was not to use the picture to illustrate what happened at Nong Khai (though it is a picture from a major Buddhist festival). But what I have seen of “coyote dancing” (on the web) seems very similar to what the girl in the photograph was doing (along with a large group of other dancers).
Quality comment or not?
0
0
It simply proves that most Thais are fake Buddhists. It makes them feel good to wear the tag of Buddhism while they actually practice animism and hedonism. What is worrisome also is the queen’s intervention in anything at her whim. This manner of intervention runs counter to the constitutional monarchy she is under. If she has any complaint, she should address it to the Prime Minister.
Quality comment or not?
1
0
These dancers are simply subhuman when they assume the role of coyote (or cayote), which is a kind of wolf. Many literal-minded Thais pronounce the word โคโยตี, another problem of English-Thai correspondence.
Quality comment or not?
0
0