New Mandala

New perspectives on mainland Southeast Asia

New Mandala random header image

Rhett Butler on “avoided deforestation” in Burma

November 11th, 2006 by Nicholas Farrelly · Add a Comment

Rhett Butler - the creator of mongabay.com, a rainforest website, and author of the article that originally prompted me to pose some questions about the idea of “avoided deforestation” in the Burmese scene - has written me a short note which he is happy for me to post to New Mandala

He writes:

My main incentive for writing the article on Burma (and a number of other countries) was to spark a discussion on the basic concept of using carbon finance to fund forest conservation and sustainable use of forest resources in developing countries.  I chose Burma because it is poor, has a horrendous deforestation rate, and most Americans, rightly or wrongly, think of it as some sort of North Korea without nuclear weapons.  I realize that in a place like Burma, or even Ecuador or Argentina, it is unlikely that all or even the majority of deforestation can be stopped for the very reasons cited in the discussion.  Further, since Burma is ruled by a military junta that may very well use the funds to further suppress opposition, it is a special case.  Maybe more income through carbon finance is actually a bad thing for most Burmese since they won’t see the money?  Anyway, my point was to get people talking and also to bring these possibilities, even if remote, to the attention of delegates meeting in Nairobi.

Cheers,

Rhett

Thanks to Rhett for offering his perspective on this important evolving issue.  If there are any other comments from New Mandala readers, please feel free to join the conversation.

Tags: Burma · Trans-Border Issues

0 responses so far ↓

  • Add your comment in the form below.

Leave a Comment

Please note: New Mandala encourages vigorous debate. However, for the moment we will only be publishing high-quality comments that make original contributions to discussion. There will, of course, still be space for pithy, humorous, eccentric and cheeky input. Short and sweet will usually trump long and involved. Repetitive ranting, unimaginative point-scoring and idle abuse will not be entertained. Comments which carry a real name are also more likely to be approved. Thank you for your ongoing interest and contributions.

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>