I have been giving some thought to the intellectual lessons that have emerged from the Thaksin and post-Thaksin era. The difficulty scholars have had in grappling with Thailand’s political crisis suggests that this may be a good time for some rethinking of familiar concepts.
To set the ball rolling, let me start with a concept (perhaps a too grand a label) that I have always viewed with considerable suspicion: phum panyaa (local knowledge, local wisdom). My hope is that this concept can now be consigned to the intellectual dustbin. For a while it seemed to have considerable potential in defending the knowledge of rural people against the insensitivity of state agencies and development projects. It certainly was a useful political move to highlight the knowledge that local people deploy in the management of natural resources and the pursuit of their livelihoods. Unfortunately, however, phum panyaa became mired in the pastoral fantasies of urban intellectuals. It came to be selectively packaged in terms of an eco-romantic and anti-modernist preoccupation with subsistence economy, forests, and other-worldly pursuits. And, when political push came to shove its empowering force evaporated. Academics and NGO activists who had rallied behind the phum panyaa banner of rural people’s knowledge were all too quick to label them as country bumpkins when it came to their political decision making. Farmers who had been lauded for their ability to carefully manage the forests where the umbilical cords of their children were buried were suddenly transformed into baht-seeking opportunists who sold their votes to the highest bidder. In other words, within the phum panyaa framework, local knowledge was narrowly defined in the image of urban romanticism, a definition which stripped rural capability of its adaptability, innovation, experimentation and pragmatism.
Recovering a sense of the dynamism, diversity and modernity of local knowledge, including local political knowledge, is one of the key academic challenges of the post-Thaksin era.











5 responses so far ↓
1 Srithanonchai // Jun 13, 2007 at 10:42 pm
According to Paiboon Watthasiritham’s revised community assembly bill, currently being debated by the government, such councils’ major task would be “to support communities in conserving or restoring customs, local wisdom, good communal and national art and culture…” (article 19, No. 1).
Sounds very modern, doesn’t it?
2 Grasshopper // Jun 13, 2007 at 11:08 pm
Do you think that the rural people in question consider that their potential for political engagement has been stultified by NGO & academic romanticism?
This is the fatalism of modernity.
3 New Mandala » Power, progress and impoverishment // Jun 14, 2007 at 6:09 pm
[...] the light of my post yesterday about the conceptual weakness of many discussions of phum panyaa (local wisdom) I was [...]
4 Amateur // Jun 14, 2007 at 7:33 pm
“Phuum Panyaa” was a wonderful package to petrify rural Thailand as a folklore museum and to prevent rurals contesting the dominance of the Bangkok Elite. Virtually every Bangkokian think of rural protesters as hired hillbillies not knowing what they are marching for. It is the same Mandala thinking of the ruling center as it has been for centuries.
The only one who seriously challenged this power structure was Thaksin, and he got inexorably punished. Rural Thailand is just a vassall of Bangkok, only allowed to pay tribute (in form of local wisdom).
“Rebels not tolerated”
5 dukdeek yoakyeg // Jun 23, 2008 at 2:57 pm
Agreed. This local wisdom is but a hoax.
Leave a Comment
Please note: New Mandala encourages vigorous debate. However, for the moment we will only be publishing high-quality comments that make original contributions to discussion. There will, of course, still be space for pithy, humorous, eccentric and cheeky input. Short and sweet will usually trump long and involved. Repetitive ranting, unimaginative point-scoring and idle abuse will not be entertained. Comments which carry a real name are also more likely to be approved. Thank you for your ongoing interest and contributions.