The July edition of Asean Focus Group’s Asian Analysis has two short articles that will be of considerable interest to New Mandala readers.
- Hazel Lang, formerly at the Australian National University and now based at Griffith University, writes about refugees along the Thai-Burma border. She concludes that:
…whilst resettlement provides people with hope for a new life abroad it does not contribute to enduring solutions in the form of a permanent resolution of the underlying causes of displacement across in Burma’s eastern borderlands, where an estimated further 500,000 people are internally displaced. Every month hundreds of new arrivals cross the Thai border seeking refuge. Thus in approaching truly sustainable solutions, we cannot isolate the refugees in the Thai border camps from the wider context continuing to cause displacement of communities.
- Bertil Lintner, journalist and author, has a short piece titled “Thailand and Post-Thaksin Politics“. He argues:
…the Thaksin era in Thai politics seems to be over, and new actors are emerging on the scene. In the final analysis, the Thais seem to be tired of decades of corruption, which many feel only got worse under Thaksin’s administration, and now are looking for a cleaner, more modern government that can lead the country once the military has stepped aside. But, given what happened to Thaksin on September 19 last year, it is also clear that the military is not going to become an apolitical player any time soon.










1 response so far ↓
1 Srithanonchai // Jul 6, 2007 at 9:11 pm
Lintner speaks of the “vote for change in Chiang Mai.” One would like to know what the result of the previous mayoral elections was. There should also be a distinction between local and national politics. Finally, the “vote for change” would not have happened if there had not be a conflict in the ruling group, which led to a former close associate of the mayor leaving the group and running as an independent. If that had not been the case, there would have been no “vote for change,” because the outgoing mayor would have won again.
Leave a Comment
Please note: New Mandala encourages vigorous debate. However, for the moment we will only be publishing high-quality comments that make original contributions to discussion. There will, of course, still be space for pithy, humorous, eccentric and cheeky input. Short and sweet will usually trump long and involved. Repetitive ranting, unimaginative point-scoring and idle abuse will not be entertained. Comments which carry a real name are also more likely to be approved. Thank you for your ongoing interest and contributions.