On Thursday, November 15, 2007, the Election Commission of Thailand (ECT) led representatives of political parties to the Temple of the Emerald Buddha in Bangkok in order to pledge that they would conduct their election campaigns honestly and fairly. In an editorial, The Nation (November 17, 2007) strongly criticized this event as an appeal by the ECT to “supernatural powers,” instead of using its legal means to make the election clean and fair. The editorial stated, “Organizing the oath-taking ceremony made the EC look unprofessional and desperate, and it does not inspire public confidence.”
In fact, this ceremony was not a stand-alone event. Rather, the ECT had devised the khrongkan lueaktang choeng samanachan (project for elections with one opinion) many months ago as an attempt to reduce illegal practices and complaints in the hundreds of local elections the provincial election commissions (PEC) had to organize this year. The project was thus implemented country-wide. In July this year, I had the opportunity to participate in such an event held at the Buddhist temple of tambon (municipality) Ko Khanun in Phanom Sarakham district, Chachoengsao province. This was an elaborate Buddhist ritual, including chanting, that took about two hours. Picture 1 shows the two competing groups of candidates taking the oath.
Picture 1
Pictures 2 shows a candidate drinking blessed water. Afterwards, as shown in picture 3, the candidates would be sprinkled with holy water by the temple’s head monk. From here, they proceeded to sign their names on a big banner carrying the text of the oath as well as their names. This would be kept as proof. Finally, the candidates would pay their respect to the main Buddha statues of the temple (picture 4).
Picture 2
Picture 3
Picture 4
Obviously, it could be asked what religion had to do with local government elections, and whether it was appropriate for a state agency such as the ECT to use religious beliefs, infrastructure, and personnel merely as tools to achieve its own administrative purposes. Anyway, the project was also implemented country-wide one day after the period of registration of MP candidates had ended.
I observed this ceremony on Saturday, November 17, 2007. In Chachoengsao, the ceremony was performed, starting at eight o’clock, under white tents erected in front of the new building of Wat Sothorn, which houses the original of the famous Buddha statue Luang Pho Sothorn. This was a better choice than to do it inside the hall since the temple was open to the public, and there was a constant stream of visitors. The Muslim candidates were excused from this Buddhist ritual. They took their oath afterwards at a mosque.
At the entrance to the tents, the candidates registered and also signed a document showing their pictures and the logos of their political parties. This would later be printed by the PEC and sent to all households in the respective constituencies, as an attachment to the notification of household heads about who had the right to vote in their houses. The participants also received the ceremony schedule and the text of the oath. When the ceremony had already started, and people might have thought that the Chaisaengs would boycott the event, first Wuthipong and then Thitima finally showed up. An official from the PEC had also noticed their absence, and remarked, “We have invited all candidates. But we cannot force them to participate.” The candidates were seated according to their constituencies.
The provincial governor also briefly addressed the candidates. Picture 5 shows him sitting with two PEC members to the left, and the PEC’s chairperson to the right. Behind them are members of Chachoengsao’s two constituency committees. As on the first day of candidacy registration, the two remaining PEC members were absent. One of them, Chachoengsao’s police commander, had been transferred to the police regional office in Khon Kaen as deputy commander after having served on the PEC for only a few weeks. The fifth member is an active military officer. This set of provincial election commissioners was appointed only on July 3, 2007. The seating arrangement shown in the picture is formalized and used in many bureaucratic settings. There will be a sofa set with a table for drinks etc. for the big guys in the hierarchy, while ordinary chairs for their subordinates and people of lesser importance will be placed behind them.
Picture 5
The main content of the governor’s address (picture 6) was given in the schedule of the ceremony as follows:
Give advice to the candidates in the election to the House of Representatives of Chachoengsao province in order to create agreement about knowing how to lose, how to win, know forgiveness, and know and love unity. They should maintain being friends before and after the elections so that the election campaign would proceed transparently, without breaking the election law, without vote buying, and without slandering each other. Finally, they should join in developing the province of Chachoengsao.
Though brief, the text and the event of which is was part still express some of the bureaucracy’s patronizing attitude towards politicians. In fact, one wonders why any self-respecting candidate would bother turning up at all at such a ritualistic event imposed upon them by the state bureaucracy.
Picture 6
Afterwards, the ceremony moved towards its core, the oath, but not before a PEC member, Prawat Chinotom, a retired lecturer from the Rajaphat University, had given another brief speech. He is shown in picture 7. Note that most of the officials, and even most of the candidates, were dressed in yellow, thus placing themselves within the current bureaucratic-royalist model of Thai politics. One might ask why the candidates, as supposedly independent citizens in a genuinely political role, would adopt the bureaucrats’ prescriptions. In fact, according to the schedule of the event, the candidates were not required to wear yellow dress. Only the dress code for officials was expressly given as “yellow dress,” though one might well ask why the civil servants and state employees taking part in the ceremony were not allowed to wear ordinary outfits. As for the candidates, they were merely asked to dress “politely,” or wear their parties’ dress. Picture 7 shows that the journalists certainly did not identify themselves as belonging to the bureaucratic sphere. None of them, as far as I remember, was dressed in yellow (the man with the yellow shirt taking a picture works in the PEC office).
Picture 7
Here is a rough translation of the PEC member’s speech (as given in the prepared text):
Chairperson of the election commission, provincial governor, prospective members of parliament, honorable guests. The election commission has ordered us to perform a samanachan [be of one opinion] ceremony today, expecting that those who will compete in this election will have the feeling that they are like brothers and sisters towards each other, like fellow citizens, and not like enemies. They should therefore not use violent means or excessive amounts of money, which would lead to an electoral culture that is not beneficial to the country. It would also not set a good example for the next generation. Therefore, the election commission has invited all of you to join our samanachan ceremony in order to create confidence that the up-coming election of Sunday, 23 December, will have a warm and harmonious atmosphere. This is the electoral culture everybody hopes for.
I have been assigned by the election commission of Chachoengsao province to perform the duty of reading the oath to Luang Pho Putthasothorn and to the sacred things of the candidates, who compete to be Members of Parliament for Chachoengsao province. This will be done today simultaneously in the entire country. Regarding Chachoengsao province, we have organized the ceremony in front of the Uposatha hall of Wat Sothorn, in front of the sacred Luang Pho.
The election commission and the people of Chachoengsao are very pleased that all of you have come here today in order to pay respect, ask for blessing, and make your pledge. This shows your sincerity, that you are ready to volunteer to serve the nation with willingness and determination, that you are ready to be an honorable member of the House, based on knowledge, thoughts, morality, virtue, ethics, and honesty. This will make the people of the province proud. It will also bring honor to your families.
The election commission is confident that the majority of people feel that votes should be gained by clean means, without using various ways of vote buying and vote selling by some groups or some phuak (cliques).
Now the appropriate time has come to ask all of you to resolve to speak your oath together after me as follows.
At this point, the candidates and all others got up from their seats and read the oath, holding a set of flowers and joss sticks between the palms of their hands. This is shown in picture 8. Somehow, Khun Phanee of Phuae Phaendin party did not have the text with her, so she glanced over to her competitor Khun Chatchawal of the Democrats to read the text.
Picture 8
Again, I have provided a rough translation. As for the ritual at the Emerald Buddha, The Nation’s editorial mentioned above said, “Conspicuously absent was the part that says calamity will befall those who fail to make good on their promises, which has always been part of such ritual oath-taking in this country.” This part was certainly present in the oath as spoken in Chachoengsao.
“My Oath on entering the electoral competition for Members of Parliament, province of Chachoengsao, Sunday, 23 December 2007. I ……………………………………. Political party……………………………, election candidate for Member of the House of Representatives, Chachoengsao province, want to pledge to Luang Pho Sothorn, all sacred things, the guardian angels, both above and below, the ruler of the world of the dead, and the guardian angel of Siam (phra sayam thewathirat), who protects our country, that I will take part in the electoral competition and volunteer to serve the country with honesty, without using money to buy votes, without using illegal means, thereby making the competition proceed with honesty and fairness, and getting good people for the country.
If I do not act according to my oath, directly or indirectly, I and my family should meet with misery and disaster. We should not find happiness in our lives. If I do good and act according to my oath, then all the sacred things mentioned will bless me and my family for happiness, prosperity, being free from illness and all catastrophes, and for having a long life.
After the candidates had spoken their oaths—and how can they be binding as essentially forced and ritualistic statements without inner conviction—they proceeded to a table with two gold-colored trays to put their flowers on, and a gold-colored pot filled with sand for the joss sticks. Most candidates rushed to the table (picture 9), while the Chaisaengs waited in the background to be alone while paying their respect (picture 10). As the last step of the ceremony, the candidates of each of the two constituencies put their signatures on the right side of their names printed on a billboard that also had the oath printed on it. This was similar to what had been done at the ceremony in Ko Khanun briefly described above. Later, these billboards were taken away and erected on the right-hand side of the old building of the provincial hall, I guess as some sort of reminder to the people and the candidates of what the latter had “promised.”
Picture 9
Picture 10
While the ceremony was still being performed, a group of protestors against an expansion of the coal-fired Bang Pakong Power plant appeared and put up a number of banners and protest signs. At the end of the official part, they distributed brown envelopes with documents to each candidate. The final picture 11 shows Wuthipong Chaisaeng carrying that envelope in his right hand and passing the protestors, who were placed at both sides of the exit.
Picture 11
One of the Democrat party’s candidates, Phatcharakriengchai Singhanat, raised his fist and exclaimed that they should not worry, because the Democrats would solve their problems. This was the one who had angered the officials on registration day by paying his fee by 20 baht notes. Phatcharakriengchai had also added some handwritten lines to the oath which he read with a very load voice after all the others had finished the prepared text, at the end raising up his right hand with the joss sticks.





















9 responses so far ↓
1 Thailand Weather // Nov 27, 2007 at 2:34 am
Pictures of smoke and mirrors…
2 Wendell // Nov 27, 2007 at 3:47 pm
Thank you. Michael, for that detailed account of proceedings in Chachoengsao. It made for interesting reading.
Reading the account, I began to speculate about the real motivation of the organizers–what exactly is this “ritualistic event imposed…by the state bureaucracy” supposed to achieve?
Obviously from the name of the ceremony, one aim is to create unity (or at least the appearance of unity). Candidates are to be reminded that though they are competing for political power, they are competing within the framework of “nation, religion, king” and must remember to act in the national interest; especially now, perhaps this implies that their little electoral exercise is occurring at the pleasure and under the watchful eye of the arbiters of national interest (no prizes for guessing who), so candidates should watch their step.
The threat of divine or karmic retribution also interests me. I wonder to what extent the organizers, and participants for that matter, really believe the threat? Is it seen as simply formula, or is it actually seen as an invocation of potentially potent magic? (Leaving aside for the moment how magic is rationalized in the Thai “Buddhist” tradition).
One potential practical effect of this ceremony is that it could be used to malign certain candidates. If some particular candidate were accused of violating the oath by acting dishonestly in the election, the violation could be presented as evidence that the person is not good and is indeed disrespectful to the nation, religion and presumably king. In addition, perhaps organizers hope that the devout/superstitious (depending on their view of the magic’s efficacy) “grassroots” people would not want to throw thier lot in with someone who is cursed to misery and disaster.
As to why candidates would consent to participate in the first place, and further why they would don their yellow shirts for the occasion, I think that the act is actually very political. Absence would imply guilt. Full participation, proudly wearing the King’s colours, is a rational political act meant to display one’s goodness and fitness for office to both the aforementioned arbiters of national interest and to the people at large, who are assumed to care.
3 Michael H. Nelson // Nov 27, 2007 at 10:22 pm
Thanks very much, Wendell, for these additional suggestions concerning interpretations of the event. Certainly, the ECT has made the fight against what they see as vote buying one of its priorities. This might well turn against them after the election, in case the ECT might not be able to catch a good number of the supposedly many wrongdoers. “Absence would imply guilt” — or bad intentions, and a politically confrontational attitude. As for the “people at large”, I think that the ceremony is more about the relationship between bureaucracy and the candidates, simply because very few people in the province will know of what happened at Wat Sothorn. You will find some more, and more direct, references to “Nation, Religion, Monarchy” in the next post. It will not be directly on the election, but rather on a contextual aspect.
4 jonfernquest // Nov 27, 2007 at 10:30 pm
“The threat of divine or karmic retribution also interests me. I wonder to what extent the organizers, and participants for that matter, really believe the threat? Is it seen as simply formula, or is it actually seen as an invocation of potentially potent magic? (Leaving aside for the moment how magic is rationalized in the Thai “Buddhist” tradition). ”
The ones that don’t believe in the oath must be the new “communists” that the military is fighting the new cold war against (that Chang Noi talks about).
[Note: In the Mon epic Ratchathirat (translated into Thai during Rama I) if someone wanted to avoid the magical efficacy of an oath they left the Buddhist scriptures out of the case they took the oath under. The Mon hero Lagunein also states categorically and rather Machiavellianly that in warfare oaths are to be violated at any time you want, that one is foolish to believe in them. Ratchathirat was suppposedly written about 1560.]
5 jonfernquest // Nov 28, 2007 at 2:22 am
“I began to speculate about the real motivation of the organizers–what exactly is this “ritualistic event imposed…by the state bureaucracy” supposed to achieve?”
Submission to the bureaucracy of course. You’d immediately recognise this sort of thing if you had worked in any hard core bureaucratic institution around here.
This sort of ceremony was par for the course in the university I worked at. Annual Tham-Hua ceremony (everyone prostrates not to HMK, but to the university president, not joyfully and willingly mind you), Brahmanic sprinking of water on teachers overseen by university president reinforcing power in lower levels of hierarchy (boycotted by missionaries, visits by royals (attended eagerly by missionaries, soldiers push Thai ajaans out of seat, ajaan farangs embarassingly llowed to keep their’s), mandatory Mo hawm day, now no doubt yellow shirt day. You name it, the mind control technique need not be associated with royalty or Thai-ness, for instance the four C’s (inherited from Toyota’s automobile plants apparently) with involuntarily committee members taking photos of cubicle work space (thus aggravating otherwise eager conformists) and secretaries making little tape marks on desks to mark where the scissors are to be placed on your desk when not using them, standard number of pencils to keep in drawer, no personal posters or decoration on wall, etc. Yes, it all wreaks of invasion of the body snatchers and solidifies bureaucratic power as per Chang Noi’s new theory:
“Third, ministries and other bureaucratic agencies must draw up long-terms plans and insist upon following these plans in their day-to-day operations so that politicians who are put in charge of these agencies will not be able to implement the policies they promise to the electorate.” (Source)
6 david w // Nov 30, 2007 at 5:43 pm
Michael,
I’ve been visiting Chachoengsao yesterday and today, and I was struck by a decent number of candidate posters up around town here and there, especially on Thanon Thepsothon. Also, I’ve noticed that many songthaew, especially seemingly all of the white ones running out towards Wat Cinprachasamosorn, have Phak Palang Prachachon stickers on their front windows and inside on the back wall panel facing the customers.
What is your sense of the comparative presence of the different parties in public and private space, and are certain areas or occupational groups clearly in support of one party or the other to any significant degree?
7 Michael H. Nelson // Dec 4, 2007 at 1:57 am
David,
You are right–just after I had finished my contribution on “celebrating the King” already, the previously very few small number of billboards of Wuthipong/Thitima were joined by those from the other candidates. There are even those showing Sanoh Thienthong who aims for Chachoengsao’s party list votes. Last Thursday, I went to Ratchasan district to observe an electioneering stage set up by the constituency committee. I was taken there by the constituency director on an involuntary detour through endless rural roads. Apparently, Itthi/Somchai had done their homework well, since we encountered numerous of their small billboards in these rather remote areas, mostly where two or three roads met. BTW, they also have 35 or so advertising pick-ups roaming the streets.
Where you saw the posters (or were they small billboards or horizontal “cutouts”?), did you notice small signs, blue on white ground, saying that this was a place designated to place election posters?
Same goes for the white song taeos, which have long been in the camp of the Chaisaengs. When I went to see the above constituency director, I took a picture of the inside as you described. It also had Wuthipong/Thitima stickers affixed. And when I used a tuk tuk, they had just affixed the PPP stickers–the white cling film littered the place where they stop at the bus station. They also have small stickers mainly showing the PPP logo.
I will contribute a post with pictures of small billboards, posters (mainly attached to boards provided for this purpose by local governments and district offices), and stickers sometime later, because I would like to wait and see how the situation will develop. On Nov. 30, I had to go to Bangkok to prepare for a presentation on Dec. 3. I was surprised to see all the cutouts on electricity poles and trees here, i.e. something you won’t see in Chachoengsao, at least not until last Friday.
Anyway, I will have a look at Thanon Thepsothon after my return to Chachoengsao tomorrow.
I would not attach too much importance to party labels, but rather more to the candidates and their voter bases. In this respect, candidates do mostly have their geographical areas where they are strong, because they have worked in that area for many years. Phanee Jarusombat is rather unsual in this respect, because in the Senate election, she got many votes throughout the province without having worked there more than about one year. In fact, she should have had her main area in Ban Pho and Plaeng Yao districts.
8 David W // Dec 4, 2007 at 6:52 pm
Michael,
A clarification – this being my first time to Chachoengsao and not so familiar with the streets, I don’t believe it is Thanon Thepsothon that has the posters, but rather the one (I forget the name) that run along the river, past the hospital / park / and down towards the military base. Running around rather quickly, I think I conflated the streets. But basically, I did notice a number of posters up here and there at certain points, seemingly more than you suggested. I don’t remember any small signs on the ground. But clearly there are certain “zones” for poster. Such as in front of the train station, for example.
Thanks for your detailed reporting on one province’s experience with the elections. I enjoy reading them.
9 Michael H. Nelson // Dec 4, 2007 at 11:17 pm
David,
Yes, at the train station, there is a cluster of an increasing number of posters. It started with only one by Thitima/Wuthipong. There is also a smaller sign saying “Space for placing election posters”, obviously erected by the municipality. Same goes for a similar space in front of the Rajaphat University, i.e. the road running along the river that you mentioned, and in front of the bus terminal.
I never really know how to call these election signs. Technically, the ECT distinguishes between “announcements (posters)” that must not be bigger than A3 (to be placed at boards provided bt local governments and government offices), and election signboards, which must not exceed 130×245 cm, to be placed at designated spaces, with or without signs saying so.
As I said, I will have a post on posters later, i.e. when the situation is more consolidated. These things started rather slowly, but have picked up since.
Thanks thst you find my reports useful.
Leave a Comment
Please note: New Mandala encourages vigorous debate. However, for the moment we will only be publishing high-quality comments that make original contributions to discussion. There will, of course, still be space for pithy, humorous, eccentric and cheeky input. Short and sweet will usually trump long and involved. Repetitive ranting, unimaginative point-scoring and idle abuse will not be entertained. Comments which carry a real name are also more likely to be approved. Thank you for your ongoing interest and contributions.