Even a self-confessed serial rapist or murderer deserve his day in court . . if only to establish his “sanity” when he committed the crimes and appropriate punishment meted out.

But in this forum , and following 9/11, there appears to be a growing clamor for “special anti-terrorism laws” that would treat suspected terrorists “differently”. I believe that will be a gross error . . .

Governments and states will use any excuse, and “terrorism” or “Southern insurgency running amuck” to shackle its citizen’s rights for expediency that would only encourage state incompetence, and worse, unchecked police abuse of basic human rights that only provoke more extremism because there is no longer any constitutional safeguard under a working rule of law.

Without any rule of law . . . extremism will follow and grow.

I could imagine what lawyer Somchai Neelaphaijit felt as he gradually realised what was happening to him. I could easily imagine a similar event happening to anyone else in Thailand who dared to challenge the illegal actions of the police

It is an ordinary Friday morning.

You leave your office on Ratchadapisek Road at 9am to meet a client at Robinson Department Store, Bangrak. Accompanied by your assistant, you drive along the Expressway and park your car at the South Bangkok Civil Court, where you instruct your assistant to deliver some documents to another client. On arriving at the nearby Robinson Bangrak store, you telephone your client and find out that due to a misunderstanding he is waiting for you at the Robinson Silom store.

You take a taxi to the store and talk with your client for two hours, then take another taxi to the Central Bankruptcy Court where you meet up with your assistant again. Unknown to you, five mobile phone users are recorded as being close to you throughout the day.

It’s 2:30pm. You drive back to your office on Ratchadapisek Soi 32, accompanied by your assistant. You stop at a gas station on Chan Road before getting on the Expressway. After spending two hours at the office, you drive to the Chaleena Hotel on Ramkamhaeng Soi 65 to meet a friend. Your assistant goes with you.

On the way you stop to pray at a mosque near the hotel and have a meal at a nearby restaurant. You arrive at the Chaleena Hotel around 7pm and wait for your friend for well over an hour before deciding to leave. You phone your daughter to tell her you are tired and will be staying the night at your brother’s home nearby.

At 8:30pm you say goodbye to your assistant at Chaleena Hotel and drive across the Saen Saab Canal to Ramkamhaeng road, where you turn left and drive towards the Lam Salee intersection.

Suddenly your car is bumped from behind. You get out and see some men seated in a black Toyota sedan which has bumped into the rear of your car. You recognise one of them as a police officer accused of torturing one of your clients. He asks you to accompany the group for some discussions.

You refuse. He gets out and pushes you towards the rear door of the black Toyota. You shout for help and struggle with the policeman. Some bystanders look on as you are helplessly pushed into the car, which drives away.

This is what happened to lawyer Somchai Neelaphaijit on March 12, 2004, just over four years ago. He was never seen again.

On Sunday, March 30 of this year, I travelled with a small group led by his wife (and presumed widow), Mrs Angkhana Neelaphaijit and their son and daughters, to retrace the steps of lawyer Somchai on that fateful day. Despite being fully familiar with the events relating to lawyer Somchai’s abduction and disappearance, this was the first time I really felt the horror of the abduction, which took place in a crowded street of Bangkok in front of bystanders.

I could imagine what lawyer Somchai felt as he gradually realised what was happening to him. I could easily imagine a similar event happening to anyone else in Thailand who dared to challenge the illegal actions of the police, as lawyer Somchai did by publicising the police torture of Muslim suspects who were his clients.

Five policemen were arrested and tried in connection with the abduction of lawyer Somchai, but eventually only one of them, Police Major Ngern Tongsuk, was convicted of physical coercion and sentenced to three years’ imprisonment. He is at present appealing the conviction. The other defendants, including his immediate superior, were found not guilty due to insufficient evidence.

Unfortunately, the defendants could not be charged with kidnapping under Thai law as they had not demanded any ransom. They could not be charged with murder because no body (or remains) was ever recovered. Both the investigation and the prosecution were carried out so poorly that links to higher-ranking officers were never fully explored.

It is widely believed, however, that a number of top ranking police officers and very possibly some individuals closely linked to the Thaksin Shinawatra administration were aware of, or involved in, the abduction and presumed murder of lawyer Somchai.

What happened to lawyer Somchai is particularly shocking because he was a prominent middle-class human rights lawyer abducted in the streets of Bangkok. However, the abduction, torture and killing of Muslim separatist suspects are common in the southern border provinces, and are rarely reported in the media.

One exception is the widely reported case of Imam Yapa Kaseng, who died in Narathiwat province between March 19-21 of this year while in military custody.

Taking these events together with the more than 2,000 extrajudicial killings that took place during the 2003 official war on drugs, the mass killings in mysterious circumstances of the entire Sabayoi Youth football team on April 28, 2004, and the deaths of 78 demonstrators taken into military custody at Tak Bai on Oct 25 2004, it is obvious that we live in a country where the military and the police are ready to abduct, torture and kill people they perceive as enemies, with complete disregard to lawful procedures.

While Thai society allows the military, police and their political masters to remain immune from accountability with regard to state violence and murder, we are all responsible for these crimes.

Jon Ungphakorn is a former elected senator for Bangkok and a Thai NGO activist.

This is why German continues to be the language of scholarship in the field of Classics.

Thank you for your kind apology, Grasshopper. In the interest of maintaining goodwill on the forum, I’ll concede that my original comment was a bit puckish; however, I maintain it was an error of degree far less than Awzar Thi’s maudlin “O Captain! My Captain!”.

I’ve expressed my opinion as eloquently as I could muster. [And it seems I can't muster very eloquently.] Since I don’t see any way for the current conversation on this thread to turn productive anytime soon, I’ll end my participation in it. I have no interest in turning this thread into an epic NM flame war.

Srithanonchai, you can “relax” now.

Mit Freundlichkeit,
Lleij Samuel Schwartz

“for me to openly criticize the Thai court’s decisions would be to flirt with lèse majesté.” > This rather seems to be about “contempt of court.” Your excuse is as lame as your response on my suggestion is cheap. Your comments imply that you have done quite a bit of data collection on Somchai and the cases he was involved in (in case your position is not merely based on emotions, that is). So, why don’t you make all this available to the public in order for us, who have done no such data collection, to get a better understanding of Somchai’s faults, naivite, support of Islamic terrorists, etc. etc.? You could even publish a shorter version in Bangkok Post and get paid for it!

Mit besten Wuenschen fuer baldige Entspannung…