<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Khmer Rouge shock troops?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://asiapacific.anu.edu.au/newmandala/2008/07/21/khmer-rouge-shock-troops/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://asiapacific.anu.edu.au/newmandala/2008/07/21/khmer-rouge-shock-troops/</link>
	<description>New perspectives on mainland Southeast Asia</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 15:28:26 +1100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: &#8220;I am ready to fight the Thais&#8230;&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://asiapacific.anu.edu.au/newmandala/2008/07/21/khmer-rouge-shock-troops/comment-page-1/#comment-513367</link>
		<dc:creator>&#8220;I am ready to fight the Thais&#8230;&#8221;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 08:06:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asiapacific.anu.edu.au/newmandala/?p=2554#comment-513367</guid>
		<description>[...] Erik Davis helpfully pointed out last time I mentioned &#8220;Khmer Rouge&#8221; fighters along the border &#8212; &#8220;it would [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Erik Davis helpfully pointed out last time I mentioned &#8220;Khmer Rouge&#8221; fighters along the border &#8212; &#8220;it would [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven</title>
		<link>http://asiapacific.anu.edu.au/newmandala/2008/07/21/khmer-rouge-shock-troops/comment-page-1/#comment-506710</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 05:27:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asiapacific.anu.edu.au/newmandala/?p=2554#comment-506710</guid>
		<description>This is a good summary of the events at Preah Vihear.
http://nyherald.com/preah-vihear-troops/306.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a good summary of the events at Preah Vihear.<br />
<a href="http://nyherald.com/preah-vihear-troops/306.html" rel="nofollow">http://nyherald.com/preah-vihear-troops/306.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erik Davis</title>
		<link>http://asiapacific.anu.edu.au/newmandala/2008/07/21/khmer-rouge-shock-troops/comment-page-1/#comment-506520</link>
		<dc:creator>Erik Davis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 00:18:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asiapacific.anu.edu.au/newmandala/?p=2554#comment-506520</guid>
		<description>This is confusing indeed - the vast majority of &#039;former Khmer Rouge&#039; fighters were given blanket amnesty (as indeed were highup leaders, including some who are now in the ECCC dock) as an attempt to prevent further bloodshed; many of those were incorporated in the state&#039;s armed forces for the same reason, which resulted in an enormous and bloated (and deeply underpaid) military.

It is an undeniable fact that some current soldiers were at one point fighting for &#039;khmer rouge&#039; groups (though it would be nice to see more precision on this, since Khmer Rouge is a term of deep imprecision when talking about the armed conflicts of the last four decades). 

Further, given the location, and the existence of the Anlong Veng area as one of the Khmer Rouge&#039;s last holdouts (Ta Mok remains a feared and respected name in the area, years after his death), it merely makes sense to assume that a fair number of the most local soldiers fought for the Khmer Rouge at one point.

It&#039;s the sort of reporting on Cambodia that infuriates a lot of us - there could very well be important news in there, but it has been subordinated to the stereotypes of Cambodian trauma - &quot;Khmer Rouge,&quot; skulls, child sex workers - that are most appreciated by a Western audience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is confusing indeed &#8211; the vast majority of &#8216;former Khmer Rouge&#8217; fighters were given blanket amnesty (as indeed were highup leaders, including some who are now in the ECCC dock) as an attempt to prevent further bloodshed; many of those were incorporated in the state&#8217;s armed forces for the same reason, which resulted in an enormous and bloated (and deeply underpaid) military.</p>
<p>It is an undeniable fact that some current soldiers were at one point fighting for &#8216;khmer rouge&#8217; groups (though it would be nice to see more precision on this, since Khmer Rouge is a term of deep imprecision when talking about the armed conflicts of the last four decades). </p>
<p>Further, given the location, and the existence of the Anlong Veng area as one of the Khmer Rouge&#8217;s last holdouts (Ta Mok remains a feared and respected name in the area, years after his death), it merely makes sense to assume that a fair number of the most local soldiers fought for the Khmer Rouge at one point.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s the sort of reporting on Cambodia that infuriates a lot of us &#8211; there could very well be important news in there, but it has been subordinated to the stereotypes of Cambodian trauma &#8211; &#8220;Khmer Rouge,&#8221; skulls, child sex workers &#8211; that are most appreciated by a Western audience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
