For Khao Phra Viharn to suddenly be an exception to this rule (Anyone who has seen an areal photograph of the setting could see how obvious it is) from such an Official Body such as UN or World Court, is against this Right and will destabilize the 2 Nations, which would otherwise be quite settled by the Borderline Principle. “Human” as a Nation or its residents are Human.

Perhaps that was the context?

[Again, what is presented here are snippets and I've not read this report, so I cannot say that it is "ba!" though I cannot claim it isn't either]

When I saw Saneh’s statement, my reaction was:
“If Saneh wants to become a political activist/supporter of the PAD, why does he not get up on their stage and give speech (a la Phuwadon)? Doing this is so pathetic”

Let me add also that some former teacher and friend of mine who I never in a million years thought would jump on to the PAD’s nationalistic bandwagon had done so. Being anti-Thaksin I can “understand” and “accept” and even expect – really. But joining this Preah Vihear campaign? This is very sad for me personally.

I refer particularly to the case of “พี่เนาว์” (the famous poet Naowarat Phongphibun) and, especially shocking, my former teacher Prof Srisak Wanliphodom. The latter even suggested a few days ago that the Thai military should lay seize to the “disputed area” and the PV temple for a year to pressure Cambodia to be more receptive to the Thai demands (or something of this sort, sorry no text readily on hand.)