<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The demise of The Nation?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://asiapacific.anu.edu.au/newmandala/2008/07/30/the-demise-of-the-nation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://asiapacific.anu.edu.au/newmandala/2008/07/30/the-demise-of-the-nation/</link>
	<description>New perspectives on mainland Southeast Asia</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 15:28:26 +1100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: jonfernquest</title>
		<link>http://asiapacific.anu.edu.au/newmandala/2008/07/30/the-demise-of-the-nation/comment-page-1/#comment-516571</link>
		<dc:creator>jonfernquest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 12:52:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asiapacific.anu.edu.au/newmandala/?p=2574#comment-516571</guid>
		<description>&quot;The Nation is reportedly in dire condition. &quot;

This raises an interesting question. How can newspapers like The Nation survive in times like these? I would say:

1. Outsource more to experts in academia whose job it is to know what is really going on, not professional pundits and &lt;B&gt;skip the press release style  journalism&lt;/B&gt; you usually find in business section...

2. Provide &lt;B&gt;rich background information&lt;/B&gt;, can you read the paper for a year and really understand the economy and business in Thailand? If not they forget it.

3. Make it all interactive , user generated content, like New Mandala, just like the NY Times says on the gateway to their op-ed section, &lt;B&gt;&quot;All the news that&#039;s fit to debate.&quot;&lt;/B&gt;

4. 70%-80% of the content should be  &lt;B&gt;business and economic news for Thailand and Southeast Asia.&lt;/B&gt; Google News gives me the rest of the world. The value of a cut and paste job onto paper is minimal nowadays. 

5. Keep it &lt;B&gt;a lean, virtual news organization&lt;/B&gt;, outsource everything.

Far Eastern Economic Review failed but IMHO an intelligent informed, intellectual organisation, that provides real value and makes some money can be built, if you &lt;B&gt;start from the ground up.&lt;/B&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The Nation is reportedly in dire condition. &#8221;</p>
<p>This raises an interesting question. How can newspapers like The Nation survive in times like these? I would say:</p>
<p>1. Outsource more to experts in academia whose job it is to know what is really going on, not professional pundits and <b>skip the press release style  journalism</b> you usually find in business section&#8230;</p>
<p>2. Provide <b>rich background information</b>, can you read the paper for a year and really understand the economy and business in Thailand? If not they forget it.</p>
<p>3. Make it all interactive , user generated content, like New Mandala, just like the NY Times says on the gateway to their op-ed section, <b>&#8220;All the news that&#8217;s fit to debate.&#8221;</b></p>
<p>4. 70%-80% of the content should be  <b>business and economic news for Thailand and Southeast Asia.</b> Google News gives me the rest of the world. The value of a cut and paste job onto paper is minimal nowadays. </p>
<p>5. Keep it <b>a lean, virtual news organization</b>, outsource everything.</p>
<p>Far Eastern Economic Review failed but IMHO an intelligent informed, intellectual organisation, that provides real value and makes some money can be built, if you <b>start from the ground up.</b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matty</title>
		<link>http://asiapacific.anu.edu.au/newmandala/2008/07/30/the-demise-of-the-nation/comment-page-1/#comment-516539</link>
		<dc:creator>Matty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 11:45:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asiapacific.anu.edu.au/newmandala/?p=2574#comment-516539</guid>
		<description>I posted the following at TJTS commenting further on Fonzi&#039;s apparent glee at Nation Multimedia Group deepening financial morass:

&quot;Fonzi apparently you could not add nor deduct properly. I looked into the same NMG financial statements you referred to, and, the arithmetic for NMG&#039;s 2007 balance sheet comes out:

Total Assets - Baht 4,148 million
Total Liabilities - Baht 3,338 million

Thus Assets less Liablities gives us NMG Equity of Baht 810 million.

I am no accountant Fonzi but I can still add, and deduct, better than you!

But I agree w/ you Fonzi that NMG&#039;s Balance Sheet situation is dire, desperate for sure. NMG&#039;s equity had consistently been shrinking annually, from Baht 2,158 million in Y2004 to Baht 810 million by close of Y2007 - that&#039;s a whopping LOSS to the shareholders of Baht 1.4 billion over a 3-year period! Jeez . . . NMG&#039;s finances must be a nightmare!

I can only guess that Y-2008 for NMG must have been financially horrendous - - probaly zero equity, or as Fonzi suspects, capital deficiency.

So if readers can begin to detect some tremor of despair (panic even ha ha ha!) from Nation&#039;s daily editorials . . . we can pin it on dire finances! Those Nation editors and reporters wages may already have been many months overdue . . .????</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I posted the following at TJTS commenting further on Fonzi&#8217;s apparent glee at Nation Multimedia Group deepening financial morass:</p>
<p>&#8220;Fonzi apparently you could not add nor deduct properly. I looked into the same NMG financial statements you referred to, and, the arithmetic for NMG&#8217;s 2007 balance sheet comes out:</p>
<p>Total Assets &#8211; Baht 4,148 million<br />
Total Liabilities &#8211; Baht 3,338 million</p>
<p>Thus Assets less Liablities gives us NMG Equity of Baht 810 million.</p>
<p>I am no accountant Fonzi but I can still add, and deduct, better than you!</p>
<p>But I agree w/ you Fonzi that NMG&#8217;s Balance Sheet situation is dire, desperate for sure. NMG&#8217;s equity had consistently been shrinking annually, from Baht 2,158 million in Y2004 to Baht 810 million by close of Y2007 &#8211; that&#8217;s a whopping LOSS to the shareholders of Baht 1.4 billion over a 3-year period! Jeez . . . NMG&#8217;s finances must be a nightmare!</p>
<p>I can only guess that Y-2008 for NMG must have been financially horrendous &#8211; - probaly zero equity, or as Fonzi suspects, capital deficiency.</p>
<p>So if readers can begin to detect some tremor of despair (panic even ha ha ha!) from Nation&#8217;s daily editorials . . . we can pin it on dire finances! Those Nation editors and reporters wages may already have been many months overdue . . .????</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
