For the past 12 days I’ve been out of email and internet contact. A very pleasant break! Today I’ve been trying to catch up on some of the stories coming of Thailand. I’ll be posting on some of them over the next few days.
First, the by-elections.
From my quick analysis there are two main messages coming from the 29 by-election contests held on 11 January.
First, there does not appear to be a strong groundswell of anger at the way in which the Democrats have come to power. This was only a small test of the electoral waters, but the results suggest that there is a common view that the Democrats should be given a chance to govern. Many voters were probably attracted by the prospect of political stability.
Second, the by-election results underline the fundamentally anti-democratic nature of the campaign waged by the PAD over the past year. A few months ago, in the wake of the October 7 violence, we argued that the PAD had chosen “blood rather than ballots” in their campaign to overthrow the elected government. In defence of an electoral solution, we argued that only a relatively small proportion of the electorate would have had to change their 2007 general election vote to produce a very different political outcome. Based on a quick analysis of the 2007 constituency results we identified 22 constituencies where a small shift in votes would have sent a Democrat MP, instead of a People Power Party MP, to Parliament.
The by-election results add some support to this argument. The Democrats picked up seven seats. Five were formerly held by the People Power Party and two by Chart Thai. Six of these seven seats were in constituencies that had been closely fought in 2007. In Bangkok(10) in 2007 the highest ranked unsuccessful Democrat candidate lost by only 0.5%. In Lamphun(1) the 2007 margin was 1.4%; in Nakhon Pathom(1) it was 1.9%; in Samut Prakan(1) it was 3.9 percent; in Saraburi(2) it was 4.6%; and in Ratchaburi(1) it was 6.7%. The only “non-marginal” seat won by the Democrats was Singburi(1) where the 2007 margin was a massive 43%. But for the January 11 by-election the Democrats appear to have secured the services of a relative (same surname) of the disqualified Chart Thai MP.
Of course a more detailed statistical analysis combined with local studies of specific constituencies, would show up all sorts of nuance and subtlety. But, overall, the by-elections show that electoral contests are there to be won and lost. The provocative and violent campaign waged by the PAD throughout 2008 was backed by the argument that PPP/Thaksin had an insurmountable electoral stranglehold. The by-elections have shown this to be nonsense.
3 responses so far ↓
1 David Brown // Jan 18, 2009 at 11:58 pm
machinations by the senior military and the rich families through their agents the PAD was and is a tragedy, not just a nonsense…
a continuation of 75 years of democracy cut short at every turn
anyway, thanks for the observations…
I keep saying that if the so-called elites were smart they would learn that they can live in a democratic society,
they would lose a lot of the comfort and ego satisfying they get now from treading on the (majority) buffaloes and grass roots as they stroll around their country but they could learn to compete and live with their fellow citizens, not to forget the refugees, hill tribes and other non-persons
its seems to be like talking to the israelis about living with the palestinians… they dont know how to listen
2 Ralph Kramden // Jan 19, 2009 at 2:10 am
Three messages, I think, from the by-elections (and not commenting on the implications): (1) the split in TRT/PPP/PT and their inability to muster a reasonable election team shows that, finally, the post-coup strategy of dismantling the “Thaksin regine” is yielding some results; (2) the political clock has been turned back at least to the late 1990s and local power brokers are most significant again; and (3) the electorate seems tired of the ongoing standoff and want to move beyond it. Giving the Dems some time and then a new election might be a reasonable strategy as the economy tanks.
3 HC lau // Jan 19, 2009 at 2:30 pm
The by-election showed nothing except the success of the military / democrats / royal troika in dismantling TRT and its re-incranations. The “judiciary” has basically disbanded the party leadership. The current crop of ‘qualified” PT leaders are the third stringers. The banned leaders are not to even appear at election campaigns or the current members may face “judiciary” wrath.
Given that scenario it is not too difficult to see the PT “not” doing so well.
Her’s the good bit. With the world economy in tail spin and Thailand’s economy in worse shape, the democrat just got themselves a huge problem – good luck.
Leave a Comment
Please note: New Mandala encourages vigorous debate. However, for the moment we will only be publishing high-quality comments that make original contributions to discussion. There will, of course, still be space for pithy, humorous, eccentric and cheeky input. Short and sweet will usually trump long and involved. Repetitive ranting, unimaginative point-scoring and idle abuse will not be entertained. Comments which carry a real name are also more likely to be approved. Thank you for your ongoing interest and contributions.