New Mandala

New perspectives on mainland Southeast Asia

New Mandala random header image

Care for a rat?

July 18th, 2009 by Andrew Walker · 3 Comments

owl

Thanks to a reader, here is another of our occasional updates on the rattus rattus situation in mainland southeast Asia. IRIN News reports that owls are being recruited to the fight against rats in northern Laos. As in other parts  of the region, bamboo flowering is blamed for high rat numbers:

Experts attribute the unusually large number of rodents to bamboo flowering: As the availability of bamboo seeds – a popular food for rats – increases, so too does the rats’ fertility. Rattus rattus, the rat responsible for the outbreak, has decimated rice crops in many villages. Seventy-four percent of interviewed households reported 50-100 percent losses; 100 percent rice losses were common, the WFP survey said. “I’ve lost about a third of my total paddy rice crop and 80 percent of my entire upland rice crop,” Bounfaeng Leukai, a villager in Xay District said, describing the situation as the worst he has seen in more than two decades. “Seventy to 80 percent of my other crops – sesame and maize – are also gone,” he said.

Tags: Environment · Laos

3 responses so far ↓

  • 1 jeplang // Jul 23, 2009 at 3:55 am

    A Review of the Biology and Management of
    Rodent Pests in Southeast Asia
    Grant R. Singleton and David A. Petch
    Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research
    Canberra 1994

    p13
    After visiting the areas affected by the 1991
    plague and talking to government officials and
    villagers, we were not convinced of this link be-
    tween the bamboo flowering and rodent outbreaks.
    The story appears to have developed only over the
    last ten years or so and may have come across from
    northern Thailand (Walter Roder, pers. comm.) One
    would expect that if there were a well established
    relationship between bamboo flowering and the
    appearancc of rodent plagues, then the story would
    be enshrined within the folklore of the local people.
    They are very careful observers of the environment
    and it is extremely unlikely that such an important
    relationship would have gone unnoticed prior to the
    past decade. It may be that the bamboolrodent story

    p16
    is an argument of convenience, deflecting the blame
    to an act of nature rather than to the fa& manage-
    ment of the hill tribes. However it is difficult to be
    definitive when reviewing the cause of an outbreak
    that occurred two years earlier and when so little is
    known about the animals involved.
    There is much work to be done to ascertain
    whether any of these stories about the relationship
    between rodent plagues and bamboo flowering are
    true. There is so little known about the biology of
    the rodents that even the identity of the main pest
    species is uncertain. From talking to farmers and
    officers of the Agricultural Services and Extension
    Agency, it appears that there are three sizes of pest
    rodents. The largest one is assumed to be a bandi-
    coot, probably the great bandicoot, Bandicota
    indica, the middle sized one the ricefield rat, Rattus
    argentiventer, and the smallest probably a species of
    Mus (M. caroli or M. cervicolor).

  • 2 jeplang // Jul 23, 2009 at 4:04 am

    Always exercise caution when attempting to explain animal population cycles.
    Correlation does not necessarily imply causation.

  • 3 Basil // Jul 23, 2009 at 7:03 pm

    Driving back from Nakhon Sawan to BKK a few weeks ago, it was clear from the number of roadside sellers offering said rodent for human consumption that many Thais ‘care for a rat’. There is even a special symbol that they erect up the road from their stalls to show drivers that they are selling this apparent delicacy.

Leave a Comment

Please note: New Mandala encourages vigorous debate. However, for the moment we will only be publishing high-quality comments that make original contributions to discussion. There will, of course, still be space for pithy, humorous, eccentric and cheeky input. Short and sweet will usually trump long and involved. Repetitive ranting, unimaginative point-scoring and idle abuse will not be entertained. Comments which carry a real name are also more likely to be approved. Thank you for your ongoing interest and contributions.

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>