The adoption of the Terms of Reference of the ASEAN Inter-Governmental Commission on Human Rights (AICHR) on 20 July 2009 is another major milestone following the ASEAN Charter which was ratified at the end of 2008. It may seem that ASEAN is moving towards a “Rules-Based entity” which respects the rights of individuals.
The ASEAN Charter now establishes this association as a legal entity – with rights and responsibilities and paves the way for the creation of an ASEAN Community. The ASEAN Charter also provides a more concrete basis for implementing the three pillars for the formation of the ASEAN Community. Member states had agreed, through the Declaration of ASEAN Concord II, with blueprints for economic, security and socio-economic reforms by 2015.
The three pillars are (1) the ASEAN Economic Community (AEC) which allows for free-flowing goods, services, investment and skilled labour, (2) the ASEAN Security Community (ASC) which reemphasis ASEAN’s priority in ensuring the region remains stable and free from foreign interference and (3) The ASEAN Socio-Cultural Community (ASCC) which addresses the concerns of citizens (social protection, environmental sustainability and sustainable development, social governance and preservation and promotion of cultural heritage and identity) – all of which are based on a recognition of human rights.
Progress in the first two pillars (AEC and ASC) has been clearly significant in comparison to the socio-cultural pillar. This demonstrates ASEAN’s key priority – pursuing economic growth and domestic security far above human rights. The importance that ASEAN gives to civil society in comparison to the business community may indicate the place socio-cultural issues has in the ASEAN process. This is not surprising too, as most (or all) ASEAN member states have serious issues with regards to human rights domestically. With the implementation of the AICHR, ASEAN member states will place higher priority in achieving the goals of the ASCC.
That ASEAN is a strategic partner in both the security and economic sphere to all the major powers may also explain the slow progress in the socio-cultural sphere. ASEAN’s biggest contribution to date has been its ability to reduce intra-regional conflict and its strategic role in facilitating regional stability in East Asia – which is welcomed by the major powers. ASEAN has managed key flashpoints in the region through quiet diplomacy both internally and externally. All major powers – the U.S., China, Japan, the E.U., and India continue to court ASEAN.
It is hoped that with the implementation of the AICHR, ASEAN and the international community realises that the three pillars that will make the ASEAN Community should be addressed simultaneously and not in any particular order. Economic and security gains that do not benefit the citizens of ASEAN are ultimately meaningless.
2 responses so far ↓
1 Thanawat Pimoljinda // Aug 10, 2009 at 7:35 pm
Generally speaking, ASEAN started with political and security cooperation in the course of which attempts have been made to develop closer relations though the creation of an economic community. At its very outset, even though an enormous effort was put into establishing ASEAN, it was generally only seen as an instrument of nationalist elites in their efforts to secure domestic stability and oppose external challenges—divisive political ideologies, communist insurgencies and separatist ethno-religious nationalist movements. Even today, to secure its internal political economy, Southeast Asian states need to participate in or integrate with the international market and open their countries for foreign capital inflow. The role of ASEAN, in this regard, seems to have changes as a result. That is because they are not only the arenas for political action by weak or small states in arranging their collective security and acting against outside threats, they are also stages in promoting regional and domestic economic development — through ASEAN Economic Community. In the period of the globalized economy, therefore, ASEAN is seemingly used to enhance the internal economies of member states on the one hand, and enable them to deal with global economic cooperation and competition on the other hand.
2 Greg Lopez // Aug 12, 2009 at 10:08 am
The above comment is a fair assessment for ASEAN. The big question is undoubtley, if this role has been good for the citizens of ASEAN.
ASEAN boasts of some of the best performing economies over the past 40 years – delivering on social goods. At the same time abuse of power (e.g. corruption, human rights abuse) have been justified in the name of stability for economic growth.
The question now – looking forward – is how can ASEAN be an instrument to reform domestic governments in meeting genuine international human rights standards (e.g. UDHR, civil & political liberties)
Leave a Comment
Please note: New Mandala encourages vigorous debate. However, for the moment we will only be publishing high-quality comments that make original contributions to discussion. There will, of course, still be space for pithy, humorous, eccentric and cheeky input. Short and sweet will usually trump long and involved. Repetitive ranting, unimaginative point-scoring and idle abuse will not be entertained. Comments which carry a real name are also more likely to be approved. Thank you for your ongoing interest and contributions.