New Mandala

New perspectives on mainland Southeast Asia

New Mandala random header image

Najib in 2010 – More of the same?

January 7th, 2010 by Greg Lopez · 10 Comments

Najib Razak, who became Malaysia’s sixth Premier on 3 April 2009, is hoping that Barisan Nasional (BN), the coalition he leads, will not suffer the fate of the Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) in Japan at the 13th General Elections.  The LDP, who had effectively been in power for six decades, was given a rude awakening when the people of Japan decided they had enough and voted in the Democratic Party of Japan. Najib must see a parallel: BN (and its predecessor, the Alliance) has ruled Malaysia since independence, now faces an electorate that is disgusted with the BN.

Najib has sought to restore public confidence in his administration having come into power under the worst possible circumstances (read here). His first year in administration demonstrated his strategies – firstly regaining full control of the United Malays National Organisation (UMNO) leadership, which he skilfully did at UMNO’s 59th General Assembly. His supporters and those acceptable to him (except Khairy Jamaluddin) won key leadership positions in the party (read here). Nevertheless, ideologically, UMNO and Najib remain divided between those who support “Ketuanan Melayu” (Malay supremacy) against the less racist concept of “Kepimpinan Melayu” (Malay leadership) which Najib espouses. To date Najib has failed to address this divide.

Najib’s second strategy has been to undermine the opposition coalition (read here , here and here). It is widely reported that Najib has used the Judiciary, the Royal Malaysian Police and the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission to hound opposition law makers, especially key leaders, and to discredit them. Furthermore, Malay leaders in the opposition coalition have been accused of betraying the Malays, Malay institutions and Islam while non-Malay leaders have been accused of insulting the Malays, Malay institutions and Islam. It goes without saying that this strategy is to distract Malaysians from substantive issues plaguing his administration and the nation and to cripple the opposition administratively and through fear.

Najib’s deadliest measure to undermine opposition state governments has been through withholding of federal funding. Planned development budgets have been shelved indefinitely and Kelantan (one of Malaysia’s poorest state and under opposition rule) has even stopped recieving payment for oil royalties, justified by the government using a draconian and obscure 1969 Emergency Ordinance (read here). Without the ability to raise their own taxes, opposition state governments are hard-pressed to find the necessary funds to meet their outlays. Ironically, Najib’s attempts to undermine the opposition have only further damaged his sullied reputation.

Najib’s third strategy to regain public confidence is the promise of reforms. He introduced the 1Malaysia concept with the tagline “People first, performance now.” There has been much hype in the mainstream media and government agencies about the 1Malaysia concept but the more seasoned sections of the electorate understand that this is nothing more than a BN ploy. Mahathir is believed to be the first to use such a slogan when he introduced “Bersih, Cekap, Amanah” (Clean, Efficient, Trustworthy) as soon as he came into office. Mahathir’s 23-years in power were marked by an administration that failed to embody this slogan.  A more fundamental question posed by Najib’s detractors is – If all Malaysians are equal as provided by Malaysia’s Federal Constitution, why the need for any other concept especially by a ruling party that espouses Malay supremacy?

Najib’s tasks to restore public confidence in his administration are made difficult by a domestic and global environment that is unfavourable. Domestically, his coalition is in tatters. All BN key component parties in the Peninsular have been left for dead after the 12th general election while in East Malaysia, the component parties who ensured that BN remained as government are now demanding payback. They are happy to work with anyone (PR or BN) who will give them what they want. This has forced Najib to deal directly with different parties and vested interests – departing from BN’s formula of each race/communal based party addressing problems within the community. Symptomatic of these problems is The Malaysian Chinese Association (MCA), second in seniority in the BN, is facing a leadership crisis with the central committee passing a no confidence motion against the President and with no solution in sight. UMNO had sought to intervene in the party but were criticised. Najib has since dealt directly with various sections of the Chinese community (Chambers of commerce, educational foundations, etc) sidelining the MCA. Furthermore, The MCA, together with UMNO is also involved in Malaysia’s biggest scandal to date – the Port Klang Free Trade Zone (PKFZ) scandal (read here). This scandal has continued to sully Najib’s efforts to build his image.

While crony capitalism is argued to be the hallmark of BN, the perception that Najib is corrupt is certainly damaging his efforts to restore public confidence. Malaysia currently ranks 56 in Transparency International’s Corruption Perception Index – a drop of 20 places since 2001 and the worst ever – despite the various measures to weed out corruption and promises of reform.

Malaysia’s domestic situation has made Malaysia a lightweight on the international front. It is widely believed that Najib does not have the charisma of Mahathir or Anwar Ibrahim needed to become an international figure. Furthermore, with the political baggage he brings, Najib has sought to please the big powers in an effort to restore his and Malaysia‘s standing. Najib’s recent moves to please the U.S. especially has damaged Malaysia’s long held position of neutrality (read here) and a leader among developing countries (read here).

On the economic front, Najib is finding it difficult to make the necessary reforms to restructure the Malaysian economy as vested interests are adamant economic policies remain the same, despite a global economy that has made Malaysia’s export oriented economic model vulnerable. Najib, as a face saving measure had announced his intention to move Malaysia into the “High Income Economy” category (There is a consensus the Mahathir’ Vision 2020 to turn Malaysian into a developed country will not be achieved) by focusing on the services sector.  However, it has been more than three months since the announcement was made but no detailed plan on how this is to be achieved has been provided (read here). Najib has, no doubt, introduced several measures to liberalise the Malaysian economy. However, these piecemeal efforts, supposedly done so as not to alarm the Malay chauvinists within UMNO only demonstrates Najib’s inability to put the national interests above his and UMNO’s interests.

With the global economy making a slow recovery, his coalition in disarray, an electorate concerned about the quality of life and fed – up with the BN – and an opposition coalition capitalising on the ‘Rakyat’s’ discontent, 2010 promises to be another challenging year for Najib and Malaysia. Will Najib dish out more of the same, or will he sincerely attempt to reform his party, his coalition and the country?

Update (1): 04/03/2010 An interesting analysis on both Barisan Nasional and Pakatan Rakyat from the Malaysia’s representative to the committee for a workers’ international. (Read here)

Tags: Corruption · Malaysia · Najib Razak · Politics

10 responses so far ↓

  • 1 Susie Wong // Jan 9, 2010 at 9:58 am

    While watching CNN, I was shocked when seeing Muslim Malaysian shouting with anger over the “Allah” issue. I felt even more frightened when reading the news that “the Malaysian government at least tacitly sanctioned the violence” against Christian churches.

    Quality comment or not? Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  • 2 Greg Lopez // Jan 9, 2010 at 11:15 am

    Hi Susie,

    This is a timeless UMNO tactic – to use the race and religious card to incite the Malays and to frighten the non – Muslim/Malays. I personally think it won’t work this time. Malaysians have come to understand this UMNO strategy well.

    Read some of the issues http://bangmalaysia.wordpress.com/2010/01/07/razaleigh-raps-umno-over-allah-controversy/” rel=”nofollow”>here, here and http://www.themalaysianinsider.com/index.php/opinion/breaking-views/48914-the-allah-protest-the-2-faces-of-1-malaysia–amer-hamzah-arshad-loyarburokcom” rel=”nofollow”>here.

    Quality comment or not? Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  • 3 Susie Wong // Jan 9, 2010 at 3:40 pm

    “Allah” is the common word used in describe the Christian God in Arabic-speaking countries like Egypt, Syria and Indonesia, according to the New York Times today (Churches Attacked in Malaysian “Allah” Dispute). So why the Malaysian government ban on the use of “Allah” by Roman Catholics as a translation for God.

    I could not believe that Najib is unable to understand how serious the conflict could become when he mixes politics, ethnics and religion together. Najib lacks the vision of diversity and inclusion.

    Najib cannot have the cake and eat it too. He cannot take a stand on banning the use of “Allah” by Roman Catholics and at the same time condemning the Muslims in attacking the Christian Churches. By discriminating against Roman Catholics, Najib certainly is aware of the fact that he is creating a conflictual situation.

    Quality comment or not? Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  • 4 Greg Lopez // Jan 11, 2010 at 12:19 am

    The view of a Malay leader who feel that minorities have “oppressed” the majority”. Is this the representative view of all Malays?

    Quality comment or not? Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  • 5 Susie Wong // Jan 11, 2010 at 11:29 am

    Is the Malaysian government pursuing a Taliban State in Southeast Asia? Here’s the excerpt from Malaysian Uproar Over the Word ‘Allah’, New York Times, Jan 10,2010.

    “An uproar among Muslims in Malaysia over the use of the word Allah by Christians spread over the weekend with the firebombing and vandalizing of several churches, increasing tensions at a time of political turbulence.

    Arsonists struck three churches and a convent school early Sunday and splashed black paint on another church. This followed the firebombing of four churches on Friday and Saturday.

    On New Year’s Day, the Islamic morality police arrested 52 unmarried couples in budget hotels — mainly students and young factory workers — who were expected to be charged with the offense of close proximity.

    Earlier last year, a Muslim woman was sentenced to a public caning for drinking beer in a hotel.”

    Quality comment or not? Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  • 6 Greg Lopez // Jan 11, 2010 at 1:14 pm

    Here is an interesting analysis from M. Bakri Musa, a respected Malaysian intellectual now residing in the U.S.

    Quality comment or not? Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  • 7 Greg Lopez // Jan 12, 2010 at 2:09 am

    Allah Unites Some, Divides Others.

    More analysis on the current unrests in Malaysia.

    Quality comment or not? Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  • 8 c. farrell // Jan 25, 2010 at 11:03 pm

    Factual correction: The woman was not “sentenced to a public caning”. There is no public caning in Malaysia. All the caning is done privately in prison.

    Quality comment or not? Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0

  • 9 Greg Lopez // Jan 26, 2010 at 9:33 pm

    An interesting analysis on the 12th Malaysian General Election by Clive Kessler.

    Clive provides a kind reminder of key issues that divide the nation and the future of Malaysia. Read http://www.themonthly.com.au/malaysia-politics-2008-and-beyond-clive-kessler-lowy-institute-1428” rel=”nofollow”>here.

    Quality comment or not? Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  • 10 “No.2 Muhyddin Challenging The Boss..??” « Audie61’s Weblog // Feb 18, 2010 at 2:58 pm

    [...] is seen as the new “Mahathir” (read here). Despite, Najib’s policy prescription of “Malay Leadership”, it appears that UMNO is still about “Malay Supremacy” as represented by [...]

    Quality comment or not? Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Leave a Comment

Please note: New Mandala encourages vigorous debate. However, for the moment we will only be publishing high-quality comments that make original contributions to discussion. There will, of course, still be space for pithy, humorous, eccentric and cheeky input. Short and sweet will usually trump long and involved. Repetitive ranting, unimaginative point-scoring and idle abuse will not be entertained. Comments which carry a real name are also more likely to be approved. Thank you for your ongoing interest and contributions.

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>