From the Bangkok Post:
Thailand has protested to the Australian government over the airing of a documentary critical of the Thai royal family and warned that the broadcast could affect ties between the nations.
A senior representative from the Thai embassy met with officials from Australia’s Department of Foreign Affairs on Thursday to express his concern at the programme aired by the Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC).
“The concern is that it might affect the good relations between Thailand and Australia, especially the people to people relations,” Saksee Phromyothi, minister-counsellor at the Royal Thai Embassy, said.
“We consider this an issue matter of national security… because the royal family, the monarchy, in our constitution is above politics.”
Thailand’s ambassador designate Kriangsak Kittichaisaree has also written to ABC managing director Mark Scott to complain about the programme which could breach Thailand’s lese-majeste laws which prohibit criticism of the royals.
“I regret that an organisation of the ABC’s stature has lowered its own standard by airing the said documentary which is presented in a manner no different from tabloid journalism,” he wrote.
The programme, which aired late Tuesday, was broadcast on the state-funded station only in Australia and cannot be viewed over the Internet outside the country.
But Thailand’s diplomatic missions in Australia say they have received complaints about the programme on the monarchy — which Kittichaisaree said was “the soul” of the nation and cherished by Thais from all walks of life.
“I presume that once you have decided to put this hyper-sensitive programme on air, a protest letter like mine, which I hope you will seriously heed, should come as no surprise,” Kittichaisaree wrote to Scott.
“I strongly express both resentment and disappointment with the poor decision you have made.”
The ABC could not immediately be reached for comment. But a report in the Australian newspaper said the ABC had effectively shut down its Bangkok office, sending its local staff home until further notice.
A spokesman for Australia’s Department for Foreign Affairs and Trade confirmed that Thai embassy officials had complained about the ABC programme and noted that the Thai monarchy was a much revered institution.
“However, the Australian government does not and cannot control content run by Australian media organisations,” he told AFP.
Breaking Thailand’s rules on the monarchy have seen prison sentences of up to 18 years handed down, and Australian writer Harry Nicolaides was in 2009 sentenced to three years in jail under the law over a self-published novel.
“The Monarchy is loved by all Thais… and any Thai who says otherwise will be locked up.”
One question: how can a Constitutional Monarchy survive so many constitutions being torn up?
Quality comment or not?
0
0
“However, the Australian government does not and cannot control content run by Australian media organisations,” he told AFP.
Good for him, and add “should not” also
Quality comment or not?
1
0
In other words…
“Here in Australia, we are a real democracy, not a mickey mouse police state dressed up to look like a democracy. So we don’t censor the media because that’s not what grown-ups do. So now, kindly feck off and stop huffing and puffing. Oh and by the way, if everyone loved the institution then it wouldn’t need protecting now, would it? So kindly take your propagandised little ass somewhere where they give a shit.
They should have known what reception to expect, but they live in hope that someone somewhere will take them seriously.
Alas, not this time.
Quality comment or not?
1
0
“We consider this an issue matter of national security… because the royal family, the monarchy, in our constitution is above politics.”
That should be made into a bumper sticker.
Quality comment or not?
0
0
Will your Minister of Foreign Affairs Mr. Kasit be charged with lese majeste for suggesting that the monarchy should be revamped? Everybody else who suggested this in the past has been ruined one way or the other.
Quality comment or not?
1
0
“However, the Australian government does not and cannot control content run by Australian media organizations,”
yes and why are you trying to act all big and mighty??
Quality comment or not?
0
0
The program undoubtedly had its’ flaws – eg. yet more boring CP bashing, and uncritical adulation of Handley.
But Thailand should n’t really complain : it was only shown in Australia : to ban it would have been an infringement of every Australians’ democratic right to free speach.
It was also a long overdue boost to making Australia more Asia-literate – for that Campbell should be especially congratulated.
Quality comment or not?
1
0
Do Lese Majeste laws apply to Fufu?
Why wasn’t the likely power struggle between Thongdaeng and Fufu mentioned?
Quality comment or not?
1
0
Thailand is having some difficulties emerging from the 19th Century. It is determined to retain and enforces old laws that successful democracies do not.
Australia, a modern democratic country, has its own values. The fundamental rights of all its citizens are protected by the courts. Among those rights, thankfully, is the right to free speech, free expression and free inquiry. Australians believe in the pursuit of truth — by journalists, academics, citizens — without boundaries. This freedom — which includes the freedom to disseminate knowledge — recognizes no borders, and extends to every corner of the universe.
Go Australia!
Quality comment or not?
0
0
What would happen if every Thai person was given the right to see this documentary and make up their own mind? If the sentiments of the Thai state are so universally shared by the population then surely a truly genuine statement of comment should come from the people. Otherwise we must conclude that the government is simply afraid of admitting the obvious – that not all Thai people share the same point of view about the monarchy – shocking as that may seem to the truly blind followers.
Quality comment or not?
1
0
[quote]But Thailand shouldn’t really complain : it was only shown in Australia : to ban it would have been an infringement of every Australians’ democratic right to free speech.[/quote]
What about the universal rights of all men to exercise the same right to free speech over the internet ?
I find it ironic, if not hypocritical, that an Australian TV network should run a program so highly critical of lese majeste in Thailand, while making sure that the report can’t be seen anywhere in the world except Australia.
How can you criticize the Thais for censoring the free discussion of the monarchy within Thailand and then effect the same end on a much wider scale by blocking the whole world except Australia from watching the program via the internet ?
Quality comment or not?
1
1
Lek: Has to do with copyrights I would guess.
But it’s possible to download, seen links to it from Bangkok Pundit’s comments, I think.
Quality comment or not?
0
0
Lek, BBC doesn’t broadcast it’s shows and radios on the net anymore as well. I think ABC just follows their policy.
Quality comment or not?
0
0
“We consider this an issue matter of national security… because the royal family, the monarchy, in our constitution is above politics.”
I asked a Thai friend who is an incurable royalist university professor whether their monarchy is above politics; she said it would be naive of her to believe so, on the contrary, she would rather see it intervene, use influence or power when need be as she believes in its virtue. Amazing, isn’t it?
Quality comment or not?
0
0
“However, the Australian government does not and cannot control content run by Australian media organisations,” he told AFP.
THAT is how it’s supposed to be in a democratic country.
Otherwise, Thailand and all Thais, stop fooling and calling yourself democratic or claim to run a ‘THAI-STYLE’ democracy when it’s clearly dictatorship. It’s pathetic.
Quality comment or not?
1
0
“We consider this an issue matter of national security….”
How so?
Would someone please explain.
Quality comment or not?
0
0
It’s the same level of uncompromising foolishness reflected in a much earlier anecdote I experienced when I asked a Thai woman in the NE where Thaksin is going to get all that money to pay off this and that and give farmers this and that, etc. She said, “He will pay it from his own pocket.”
Australia, I believe, should make any and all such programs global. The Thai defamation and LM laws apply to everyone, everywhere. Even in Australia.
Quality comment or not?
1
0
Kermit (13). A major function of the Thai education system is to keep Thais in child-like ignorance of their State and how it compares with others. Before we laugh too loudly, we should think about all the Oxford dons who believe in the God of the Church of England. Thailand’s dirty little secret is that the main function of the Thai State and the associated royalist mumbo-jumbo and hereditary stuff is to keep itself from being plunged into civil war by generals squabbling over promotions. Again, before laughing, we should think of ancient Rome.
Quality comment or not?
1
0
JohnH#15,
FYI: the monarchy = Thai nation
security of the monarchy= national security
Quality comment or not?
0
0
John H #15:” ‘We consider this an issue matter of national security….’ How so? Would someone please explain.”
I think they may mean something along these lines: When somebody, or a whole group of devious, bullying, dysfunctional people has been telling outrageous lies to cover up Very Bad Behaviour for a very long time, and they’ve been getting away with it very successfully, they feel smug & secure in the belief that the world sees them as normal and of good will. But when they are suddenly found out & publicly exposed, red-handed, as it were, they are bound to feel queazy, embarrassed, INSECURE.
I’ve never heard of this in the context of NATIONAL security, however, but that’s the only possible explanation I can think of.
I hope this helps.
Quality comment or not?
1
0
Gosh! I just thought of another possibility. Maybe it’s a typo. Maybe he meant ‘notional’ security. Yes, that could be the explanation…ummm, …uh…what would that mean? (Sorry, no smilie this time; my ‘wanker’ smilie won’t embed on this form.)
Quality comment or not?
1
0
Free Mind#17 :
FYI: the monarchy = SIAMESE nation
security of the monarchy= national security=no current threat if the monarchy is truly “above politics”.
Quality comment or not?
0
0
Much as I like Thailand, the time is long overdue for the “system” to be overhauled. With all due respect to the King, he is out of touch with the realities of the current situation and is advised by a Privy Council as out of touch as he is. It is a shame but without revoking the lese majeste laws, nothing will change. The elite wants an ignorant populus as it seems to believe keeping them ignorant, they can be controlled. That is a misguided belief and will be the downfall of the country. The last thing needed is anarchy but potentially it is on the cards.
Quality comment or not?
0
0
Where are the Thai Royals whilst grenades are going off in the main streets of Bangkok? Maybe everyone needs to see this show.
Quality comment or not?
0
0
I don’t think the embassy had much choice, even though they knew what the reaction would be.
Quality comment or not?
0
0
Any one who thinks that Australia has a free press and not subject to government control must be typcal PC wanker,, any media that tried or did publish views not PC approved ie: racist etc. would be taken to task by law or threats or canceling of addvertising contracts, remember haveing racist views is a right, even if the are wrong,,,, for a start who is to decide racist views are wrong,, secondly even if they were , with real freedom of speach such views should be expressed,, freedom of speac will alway offend some one,, thats the nature of it,, with no real freedom of speach thereis no freedom,,, and freedom doe,s not just mean being able to get in your car and drive where you want to, or go about your business as you wish,, Australians live under a regime of political correctness oppression, regulated by are fined , punished, and stressed out by an over policed nanny state, give me Thailand any time
Quality comment or not?
1
3