These articles seem to have disappeared from the Bangkok Post.
Apologies that neither of us have had time to post in detail on the latest on Thailand from Wikileaks. Please treat this as an open thread for links, comments and analysis.
These articles seem to have disappeared from the Bangkok Post.
Apologies that neither of us have had time to post in detail on the latest on Thailand from Wikileaks. Please treat this as an open thread for links, comments and analysis.
Keith Weller Taylor argues that this new book is thoughtful, lucid, original, analytical, and readable
Read MoreInga Gruß reviews a book about the work conditions of Myanmar migrant workers in Thailand at this time of immense change.
Read MoreSri Ranjani Mei Hua reviews a book dealing with experiences of women in Southeast Asia.
Read MoreScholarly treatments of gender in Myanmar, past or present, remain scarce. Jessica Harriden’s book thus fills a gap in our understanding of an important and controversial topic.
Read MoreDonald M. Seekins argues that this book is the story of a dynasty that belongs truly to Burma’s past.
Read MoreThis book explores the relationship between religion and violence in far southern Thailand, where Buddhist monks are a marginalized local minority.
Read MoreRevisiting Rural Places should become an essential reference text for researchers who work on social, cultural, political and economic change in Asia.
Read MoreDe-agrarianisation often isn’t very pretty, but economic disparity may well be the price to be paid for pursuing it as slowly as Thailand has over the past 50 years.
Read MoreThe creation of make-shift, idiosyncratic queer paradises provides shelter, community, and belonging for many who have refused to fit into standard narratives of Southeast Asia.
Read MoreThe models of eroticism and faith in the Hell Garden have been left behind by the robust urban bourgeois consumerist culture increasingly prominent across contemporary Thai society.
Read MoreQuestioning received notions of revolution, this book offers a passionate and rigorous reconsideration of the period in Thailand between October 1973 and October 1976.
Read MoreRead More
Read More
Read More
Read More
Copyright New Mandala 2006-2012. All Rights Reserved.

Here is a screen grab of one of the articles. Thanks to a reader.
Quality comment or not?
7
0
Not quite , try this link,
http://www.bangkokpost.com/print/211410/
Quality comment or not?
3
0
full story: http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/us-embassy-cables-documents/172121?INTCMP=SRCH
Quality comment or not?
0
0
Here are links to the three cables released:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/us-embassy-cables-documents/176996
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/us-embassy-cables-documents/79101
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/us-embassy-cables-documents/172121?CMP=twt_gu
It’s interesting that The Nation has already moved to quash talk of the cables, as it’s just an old conspiracy theory anyway: http://bit.ly/i8AHSc
Quality comment or not?
2
0
Don’t these cables disprove Ji Ungkaporn’s theory about the relative balance of power between the Military and The Palace, in particular between the Military and His Majesty ?
Quality comment or not?
4
2
James might have added that the Nation didn’t even mention the players mentioned. The Nation really does get grubby when they think that they are on a war footing.
Quality comment or not?
1
0
The whole country, and perhaps the whole world, is now digesting the implication of such an earth-shaking revelation , which is made public more than four years after the actual event. The real tsunami will come in a few days’ time.
Quality comment or not?
6
0
orwellian (c2) – while that link worked earlier this evening (Thai time, that is), a few hours later it seems to have evaporated…..
Noteworthy that The Nation’s ultra-sanitised report manages to avoid any mention of the monarchy – unless you count referring to Thailand as “the Kingdom” – but then those guys don’t need LM laws to tell them the way to go…..
Quality comment or not?
2
0
Looks like this story has been removed from/ by the BP.
I can’t find it anywhere.
Quality comment or not?
0
0
I smiled that someone got ThaiVisa Forum to send a breaking news with subject:
“AFP: Thailand’s Queen Sirikit accused of backing 2006 military coup”
to all its 40,000 members and then – like BKK Post – removed the article immediately.
Was this an accident or done on purpose?
And i think we can see a lot of empty walls in many homes pretty soon.
Smart vendors should now order a lot of Chulalongkorn pictures for the replacement.
Quality comment or not?
8
0
Not surprised the online copies are removed – the diplomats must all be on extreme OT to get that done.
Hmm… I think I may still have the SCMP copy somewhere in my trash bin. Maybe I should retrieve it and cut out that article…
Quality comment or not?
0
0
Just want to add that as a personal opinion, the 2006 coup really could not have had happened without the requisite patronage, due not only to TRT strong election results but also the rather crude maneuvering by ex-PM Thaksin to try to consolidate power to deal with the privy council. Using up what is left of the King’s hardearned and hardworn glamour was really the only other weapon left the elites could leverage against the younger and vibrant TRT and its wittier and more sly leader Thaksin. And in doing so, that shiny golden glamour had been much dulled and tarnished – hardly something that people who professed their love and loyalty for their monarch should do.
That it was the Queen behind the coup is hardly earth shattering in truth, merely in publicness of the announcement. Afterall, an image had to be maintained, even if many other already knew the “truth”. The King at the end of the day sat on the throne that can do no wrong, and what the King wants, another had to do and execute and if necessary, take the fall so that again the painstakingly polished image can be maintain its golden legend “pretentiously” untarnished.
My mother said: There is no citizen in the world that love and rever their King more than the rural Thai farmers. But the King do not love them back equally. That the King should love his people is not a necessity, but it is a tragedy in the face of such devotion grassroots supporters had for him.
Quality comment or not?
6
1