New Mandala

New perspectives on mainland Southeast Asia

New Mandala random header image

Counting Thailand’s coups

March 8th, 2011 by Nicholas Farrelly · 13 Comments

1932 is usually described as the beginning of Thailand’s century-long coup season. Once upon a time when I sought to determine when this history of coups began I was surprised to find obscure references to aborted military interventions in national politics in 1912 and 1917. Long since forgotten.

Here on New Mandala we recently hosted a discussion about Thailand’s coup history where I suggested that counting the number of coups (attempted and successful) is a complicated business. Often, when somebody asks “how many coups have there been in Thailand?”, the final number that is cited is 18 but I fear that this may be a product of force of habit rather than hard number crunching.

So I wonder if the collective expertise of New Mandala readers might help us to more precisely tally up the total coup attempts, and successful coups, in Thai history. Keeping the focus on the 20th century will make matters simpler but I appreciate that some may want to introduce more historical depth. Just to get us started I have my (probably incomplete and inaccurate) list below.

It would be terrific if we could make the list definitive.

As it stands I have 11 “successful” and 9 “unsuccessful” coup efforts in the 20th century for a total of 20. For the more obscure episodes I have added links to other details. But it would be terrific if a final tally could be made, with all of the various categories of coup (plot, attempt, success; to include กบฏ, รัฐประหาร, รัฐประหารเงียบ, etc) matched against their historical details. Definitional issues are, of course, at stake but we are happy to hear discussion on all of the technical points that matter.

Please share your knowledge to help us count Thailand’s military coups once-and-for-all. As new information is added in comments I can put it in this main list which can be revised as often as we like.

Coup (attempt) of 1912

Some details are available here.

Coup (attempt) of 1917

Aborted: Few details seem to exist.

Coup of 1932

Friday, 24 June 1932

Coup of 1933

Tuesday, 20 June 1933

Coup of 1939

Some details are here.

Coup of 1947

Saturday, 8 November 1947

Coup (attempt) of 1948

Some details are available here.

Coup (attempt) of 1949

Saturday, 26 February 1949

Coup (attempt) of 1951 (Manhattan)

Friday, 29 June 1951

Coup of 1951

Thursday, 29 November 1951

Coup of 1957

Tuesday, 17 September 1957

Coup of 1958

Monday, 20 October 1958

Coup of 1971

Wednesday, 17 November 1971

Coup of 1976

Wednesday, 6 October 1976

Coup (attempt) of 1977

Saturday, 26 March 1977

Coup of 1977

Thursday, 20 October 1977

Coup (attempt) of 1981 (“Young Turks”)

Wednesday, 1 April 1981

Coup (attempt) of 1985

Monday, 9 September 1985

Coup of 1991

Saturday, 23 February 1991

Coup of 2006

Tuesday, 19 September 2006

Tags: Coup · Thailand

13 responses so far ↓

  • 1 Federico // Mar 8, 2011 at 4:34 pm

    I would add Phya Mano’s self-coup in April 1933 in the “successful” category. Might be more contentious to say that there was another such “self-coup” in April 2010. The Boworadet rebellion in October 1933 should be in the unsuccessful attempts.

    Quality comment or not? Thumb up 5 Thumb down 0

  • 2 Federico // Mar 8, 2011 at 4:42 pm

    One more: the “Naisip Rebellion” of August 5, 1935. Details here:

    http://th.wikipedia.org/wiki/กบฏนายสิบ

    Quality comment or not? Thumb up 5 Thumb down 0

  • 3 Stuart // Mar 8, 2011 at 4:58 pm

    Is there any correlation to the Fibonacci numbers? Failing that, perhaps someone can apply a numerology exercise and trigger a profitable run on the stockmarket.

    Quality comment or not? Thumb up 1 Thumb down 2

  • 4 yabz // Mar 8, 2011 at 8:14 pm

    19 Sept 2006 was a highly auspicious day in the Chinese astrological calendar. It would be interesting to see the charts for the previous coups although unfortunately I don’t have them.

    Quality comment or not? Thumb up 3 Thumb down 0

  • 5 Thailand: Total number of coups · Global Voices // Mar 9, 2011 at 2:21 am

    [...] Farrelly, writing for the New Mandala, has counted 11 “successful” and 9 “unsuccessful” coup efforts” in Thailand in the past century. [...]

    Quality comment or not? Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  • 6 polo // Mar 9, 2011 at 3:21 am

    At the beginning of 1976 and at the beginning of 1980 military pressure forced out prime ministers in “silent coups”. The former resulted in new elections; the latter saw Prem take power for 8 years. Should at least 1980 not be included in this list?

    Quality comment or not? Thumb up 3 Thumb down 0

  • 7 john francis lee // Mar 9, 2011 at 12:56 pm

    Surely listing all the governments of the 20th century and then labeling the provenance of each would get them all?

    The unelected governments – including the hyphenated self- silent- and so on coups – could then be classified according to preference.

    Quality comment or not? Thumb up 1 Thumb down 1

  • 8 Don Persons // Mar 9, 2011 at 9:47 pm

    In the missionary records located at the Payap University archives, I found information about a rebellion in Northern Thailand in 1902. The church’s “neutral” stance actually sided with Siam. I looked it up and found this reference:

    “Phraya Chaiyabun Monument This monument is located 4 kms. from Phrae Market, being constructed as a memorial to Phraya Chaiyabun who was the governor of Muang Phrae, during the reign of King Rama V, and was killed by the Ngiew tribal people because he did not agree to set his hand in a document giving out Muang Phrae to the Ngiew during the Ngiew rebellion in the year 1902 A.D.”

    http://www.hotelthailand.com/travelinfo/north/phrae.html

    Quality comment or not? Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0

  • 9 Don Persons // Mar 9, 2011 at 10:00 pm

    A history of Thailand
    By Christopher John Baker, Pasuk Phongpaichit

    Reference to a Hmong rebellion in 1967-1968 (Baker, 175) actually is a reference to a movement in Pitsanulok, Luy, Petchabun and Phrae where a group was based in Phu Hin Rong Klao.

    The elder of a church who was part of that rebellion including the defence of Kao Ko (เขาค้อ) took me around these locations. The leader at Phu Hin Rong Klao was actually communist leader from the South. The Thai government troops lost in most battles and skirmishes, but used Chinese mercenaries effectively and eventually squeezed the rebels economically into submission. The Hmong who surrendered were “reeducated.” After returning to their villages, they found that their people had become Christians. The church elder I talked to said in so many words: I was surprised and asked “What is a Christian?” They told me they teach us to love our neighbor as ourselves. Oh? That’s what the communists said, but the only difference is that Christians don’t get killed. So I became a Christian too.”

    Quality comment or not? Thumb up 4 Thumb down 1

  • 10 Donald Persons // Mar 11, 2011 at 12:11 pm

    Are we getting anywhere with this list? why I made my two posts is because the coups are not only a matter of palace intrigue and corruption of state, but they effect the people.

    Thai social movements, although less prominent, can turn violent as all other avenues for peaceful change are exhausted. Thailand in 2010 was at a crossroads.

    Participants in former social movements squashed by the Thai military (ex., Kao Ko Monument glorifies Air Force General Arthit Kamlangeak) tend to seek new bases and forms for resistance. I assume it ruffles someone’s feathers that in the case of the Hmong in
    Thailand, Christianity offered a new base. That is a fact. If you want to bear that out statistically, look at the statistics of the 12th District of the Church of Christ in Thailand. or look herehttp://www.christiansiam.com/Church/Country/North/Phetchabun.html It compares the number of Hmong in Thailand who were Christians before 1960 (0) and after 1980 with the emergence of 45 new churches. It was Hmong Christians from Laos who held this discussion with their Thai kin at that time. There were no foreign or Thai missionaries active there at the time. Similar movement of social resistance to Thai government appeared among the Northern Thai groups I worked with for 15 years. Why resist? Land grabs, deforestation, lack of educational opportunities and other forms of state-sponsored repression (ex., local officials refusing to provide identification cards to people who have lived there for 100 years)

    I think that the residue of injustice and resistance scattered across the North and Northeast explains why the Red Shirts could emerge so quickly and powerfully, yet still have disparate agendas among the participating groups. These forms of collective memory of Thai people are interesting to me but certainly not surprising. Those who try to say that the Red Shirts are merely pro-Thaksin have no historical memory.

    Quality comment or not? Thumb up 4 Thumb down 1

  • 11 Tarrin // Mar 11, 2011 at 2:38 pm

    Donald Persons – 10

    I really want to contribute something here but my knowledge is limited to what already been said. Furthermore, there are those “silent upraise” or “silent coup” events that have very little documentation to the point where I think its almost suit the description of rumor rather than actual event. Like what polo said, during early 1980s there were so many of such attempt but very little documentation.

    Quality comment or not? Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  • 12 Donald Persons // Mar 11, 2011 at 11:20 pm

    This Thai history website lists 23.

    http://www.iseehistory.com/index.php?lay=show&ac=article&Id=5329067&Ntype=9

    Furthermore they name unsuccessful changes of governments as rebellions (กปฏ) and the successful ones as coups (รัฐประหาร)

    Quality comment or not? Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  • 13 While Thailand floods, 9 Thai Army officers are arrested for murder of 13 Chinese sailors | Asian Correspondent // Oct 30, 2011 at 11:33 pm

    [...] the numerous coups, the history of torture and abuse and, of course, several massacres, not least the one in Bangkok [...]

    Quality comment or not? Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Leave a Comment

Please note: New Mandala encourages vigorous debate. However, for the moment we will only be publishing high-quality comments that make original contributions to discussion. There will, of course, still be space for pithy, humorous, eccentric and cheeky input. Short and sweet will usually trump long and involved. Repetitive ranting, unimaginative point-scoring and idle abuse will not be entertained. Comments which carry a real name are also more likely to be approved. Thank you for your ongoing interest and contributions.

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>