Gallup Chairman Jim Clifton asserts in The Coming Jobs War, that what everyone in the world wants today is a good job. He added that the fate of a nation relies on good jobs, and that nations are in revolt and cities are crumbling for the lack of them. Can one simply accept his statement that jobs bring prosperity, peace and human development and that it is not the other way round? On the one hand, in the short term, it may be that the economy dictates the quality and character of human life. But in the long term, character values of justice, trustworthiness, mutual respect, benevolence and peace are foundational for the flourishing of any nation that strives towards a long term growth. The lack of these qualities creates tension, instability, and eventually loss of good jobs for the nation.
Ethical apathy and economic stagnation can create a cycle of decline. As Hans Kung, the President of the Foundation of Global Ethics, said to the Parliament of the World’s Religion inMelbournein December 2009,
“a painful truth is evident: this economic crisis is characterised by a notable absence of common ethical values and standards.”
In Malaysia, about 97 percent of the population claimed to adhere to faith traditions, enriched with ethical values and customs that ought to offer significant faith-based social capital. Diverse in its ethnicity and religious traditions, Malaysia theoretically should flourish much more compared to some of its neighboring countries, like Singapore which citizens are of almost the same ethnic and faith traditions but lack of land space and natural resources.
Malaysia undermines its “faith capital values” and thus retards potential economic growth, loses good jobs to other nations, and consequently, has lost almost 330,000 university graduates, especially the non-Malays; Six-hundred thousand of them have left to work in Singapore alone.
If Tun Mahathir is right that 90 percent of Malaysia’s tax comes from the non-Malays, then this “brain drain” crisis, occasioned in part by dissatisfaction with Malaysia’s social and ethical values, further undercuts the financial capital of the nation.
By recognising faith as the basis of social capital, such discourse can identify the responsibilities of the government leaders, the function of social institutions in shaping the patterns of behavior and character development of citizens, and the roles of Malaysian Muslims as the majority in the population. These three agents will have the greatest influence in bringing about change. This is not to say that public activism, marketplace dynamics, and the presence of other faiths or non-faith adherents are insignificant, but at present, they have less influence in Malaysia’s pseudo-democratic context. Thus the first step in moving forward is to analyse where the three key agents fall short.
Surveys conducted in the last quarter of 2010 in Malaysia and Indonesia on “Values, Dreams, Ideals – Muslims Youth in Southeast Asia” release good news that Malaysia Muslim youths, who are at the center stage of this nation’s population, prioritised believing in God and becoming better Muslims over becoming rich. Almost 70 percent wanted the Quran to replace the federal constitution. However, further analysis shows a contradiction, given that those interviewed are rather lax about praying, reading the Quran, and fasting, and prefer to watch television, listen to music, or surf the internet in their free time.
Data from the International Telecommunication Union (ITU) indicates that almost 65 percent of Malaysia population are internet users, a great increase from 15 percent in 2000. Youths are inclined towards technology, especially the internet and SMS text messages. Clearly, youths are increasingly consumed by the cyber world and distracted from other faith-related aspects of life, such as learning to exegete Quran passages or engaging themselves with the mosque communal gatherings and community services.
Many of those interviewed denounce violence, yet 62.4 percent perceive the late al-Qaeda terror group leader Osama bin Laden as a “freedom fighter.” This ethical contradiction has parallels elsewhere in society.
Tunku Abidin Muhriz’s analysis of this survey on the rise of social problems cites frequent incidences of underage sex and baby dumping. Harian Metro, for example, reported that Ministry of Women, Family and Community Development recorded 152,182 babies were born of 64,000 single young Muslims and non-Muslims, from 2008 to 2010. This up-rise of social epidemic is also reflected in the fact that 79.07 percent from the 18,639 drug addicts are Malays according to the National Anti-Drugs Agency of the Ministry of Home Affairs. The report says that by 2010, drug addiction among the 19 to 24 year olds increases by 99.4 percent, and 43.72 percent among the 25 to 29 years old.
Dr. Shamsul Amri Baharuddin concludes that Malaysian Muslim youth, “at the level of personal development and lifestyle, are more inclined towards personal-based piety in their overall religious outlook and practice.” In his generation-gap thesis, he also suggests that Muslim youth perceive themselves as religious, but may be superficial in their practice and knowledge of Islam; they concentrate mainly on the rituals without having deep theological knowledge.
The fact that most Malaysian Muslims are content to recite the Quran in Arabic, without understanding it or looking up the meaning in translation, let alone attempting to read the commentaries, shows little appreciation for Islamic reason and scholasticism theology. This phenomenon is what Dr. Colin Turner, a professor in Manchester University who became Muslim in 1975, describes as being Muslims by imitation instead of genuine seeking.
This pattern is also prevalent among the older generation, some who infuse the youngsters’ minds with bigotry, xenophobia, corruption, mismanagement, offensive content in political speeches, blogging, YouTube videos, and so on.
Tan Shang Neng a 23-year-old Malaysian through his writing, “We, the Betrayed Generation” in April 2011 speaks for all youth, who automatically lose a huge part of their inheritance of “faith capital value” until the situation changes.
It is undeniable that there exist some civic consciousness and constructive faith initiatives in Malaysia, but the government’s investments in religious education programs for Muslims and non-Muslims have not been very successful in nurturing deeper engagement among citizens.
Many Malaysian Muslims are unaware of the principle of Wasatiyyah on being just, rooted in the Quranic passage 2:143 “ Thus We have made of you a community justly balanced that you might be witnesses over the people and the Messenger a witness over yourselves,” as expounded by Professor Chandra Muzaffar, President of the International Movement of the Just World in his recent speech at PWTC this year.
Deep humanitarian reforms are necessary because economic perks alone will not convince Malaysians to stay and invest in their own country. At the institutional level, companies must change their corporate culture. For example, TalentCorp Malaysia has offered great ‘balik kampung’ packages for talented Malaysians abroad, including invitations to participate in the twelve sectors identified to drive the Malaysian economy. But none of the ‘Nurturing Malaysians’ opportunities cultivate healthy and competitive corporate or working cultures; If people left because of a cultural dearth, a job offer without improvement in that regard will not be effective. Naturally, unsatisfied human resources still opt for alternatives abroad.
Professor Lamin Sanneh, a scholar of religion of Yale University, explains the diminishment of intellectual engagement, after the nostalgic period of Muslim Spain, as a result of the ‘ulama’ resorting to modes of orthodox defiance. This led to competing assemblies, one under the mantle of the clerics, and the other under the remit of the politicians. The current Islamic religious landscape in Malaysia seems to fit into his proposition. Now again, there is a structure of competition between the clerics and politicians regarding social controls, which negatively impacts the faith practices and lives of Muslims and non-Muslims alike. Unless the two contingents collaborate, the whole nation will be suppressed. Therefore, faith leaders need to reevaluate people’s comprehension of the structures of power that mediate how people think about God and others.
When faith adherents harmoniously advocate and live out their common social values for the betterment of all citizens,Malaysiawill then flourish not only in creating jobs, but also in establishing a trajectory of stability and growth. Then, a new generation of 1Malaysia, who will feel a sense of belonging and loyalty to the country, will be born. This country can then be proud of its success in nurturing faithful citizens who will be more committed to their motherland in good times and bad times, supporting the national leadership and thus mitigating whatever potential hardships may come in the future.
Norani Abu Bakar is a Post Graduate Fellow and the Asia Project Director of Pathways for Mutual Respect. She can be contacted at norani.abubakar@yale.edu and blogs at Loving God and Neighbors.
This article is part of a series of articles under the theme, “Faith in Malaysia.”

Is this “faith capital” anything other than a communitarian brand of “bonding” social capital? Should Malaysia not be more concerned with developing social bonds that transcend religious distinction, perhaps based on old fashioned notions like “citizenship”? I’m not sure that adding yet another loosely-defined analytical concept adds much clarity to the picture.
Quality comment or not?
4
0
The author speaks of a dimension almost non existent in Malaysia.
This dimension of the Soul is lost to them now. They are at base level of what can I get for myself and in the shortest possible time. “If they have it why can’t I” is the thinking and all possible manifested conduct is displayed to get what they want when they want and to the extent ( almost always ) of injuring another in many ways.
Malaysia had to sink low to understand the other side of the coin. The opposite of bad is good. This fundamental truth has been lost in Malaysia and thus it has to sink to where it is today for it to change.
Justice, benevolence and peace are higher Realms that Malayisa is not at all aware off enough, let alone apply in conduct.
This is directly connected to the level of awareness of the Soul whether indivdually or as a collective,the Soul of a nation. They are a people unaware. They imitate , without deeper seeking so the meaning is lost to them as the author rightly describes, failing to ponder and have no incling towards a higher realm and thus the result is chaos as we see.
However that is the necessary precondition to the start of awareness.
We need to experience bad in order to implement Good, to come to Being Good. Perhaps the cycle will begin for Malaysia, whether individually, or collectively as a group.
Quality comment or not?
3
2
Malaysian Muslims have not a deep strong culture, thus going to pray in mosques is the only thing that holds them up. So where’s the faith that may bring hope to people of other faiths?
Quality comment or not?
2
0
interesting piece. A little fn: 2 of the three Malaysian academics she quotes or refers to are hardly role models for faith-based capital – rather they are well known political apologists for the system which has been rotting – including in academia – from the head down.
Quality comment or not?
4
0
I’m sorry, but what exactly is that link between religiosity and say, job creation? There are plenty of countries which are nonreligious, yet prosperous (Norway and should be fair examples).
Quality comment or not?
4
0
kaizen, whilst religiosity doesnt create jobs, the values we CLAIM to adhere too in malaysia should create a support or system to ensure that people have the same opportunites, justice, observence of the Rule of law .
All these will help create an strong and stable country which will in turn create a strong economy. Thus is the indirect connection that is subtle yet imperative which is profundly missing in our nation.
Quality comment or not?
2
0
Those countries that you are thinkiing off kaizen that dont have religion but are successful would still be adhereing to a higher thought processess of fairness , justice equality, education for all , no discrimination of opportunities and thus the effect is a healthy and successful ( in the majority) country.
Quality comment or not?
2
0
kaizen, your question is a good one.
Malaysia CLAIMS to have religion ( therefore high values of kindness, justice etc) but of conduct they are otheriwse. thus the country is dysfunctional.
Norway in your example claims to be non religious yet by conduct apply higher values of justice, equality, the Rule of Law, kindness etc.
So my question is which one is actually, in fact, demonstrating “faith capital values”? certainly not those nations who claim to be religous but are in utter chaos ( that would be the whole “moslem” world) but it looks to me the evidence is pointing to those who claim nothing but by conduct show everything ie using their “faith vcapital values” and result in a hgiher productive and healthy functinal nation. Would you not agree?
Thus it is one thing claiming to be something but quite another to actuall being it.
Quality comment or not?
1
0
@SRossi:
Your last point highlights the problem with concepts like “faith capital” and “social capital” more generally: we are led to construct our dialogue around these terms regardless of whether or not they mean anything.
Quality comment or not?
0
0
I hope Malaysia loses all its “faith capital” as defined by the writer, then Malaysia can proceed to a system where “fairness”, justice etc is not dependent on one’s religion!
Quality comment or not?
1
0
#1 Doug Olthof – This article attempts to remind Malaysians, 97% of the population, to live-out the good social values of their faith traditions. I agree with you that this includes engaging in a healthy social bonding that transcend religious distinction.
#3 Aoaoao – Thus, like what Aoaoao said, the religious lives of faith adherents should not just stop at going to mosques on Friday, or churches on Sunday, or temples, etc.
#2 SRossi – I do believe that there are many Malaysians, of faith traditions or without faith traditions, who have good ethics. Thus, I disagree with you that faith values are “almost non existent in Malaysia.”
I need to clarify however that social values come from various sources – culture, faith and ideologies – which make Malaysia what it is today. Of course, the people and the country will not cease to transform.
In the 6 countries that I have lived; Canada, USA, Germany, Thailand, China, and Singapore, most of the people I have interacted with have high regards towards Malaysians. I am now residing in New Haven, Connecticut – one of the most richest state in the USA – but robbery happens almost every two days, gun shots are heard almost every week. At night, the security officers walk or drive us around campus. I rather not write about my 11 years of life experiences living in China.
#8 If we focus on encouraging each other to live out these good values and addressing issues objectively, then our country will be transformed holistically into a better nation.
I agree with you that, “..one thing claiming to be something but quite another to actually being it.” Malaysian government has major role in remedying many of the citizens’ perspective that religiosity centers mainly on rituals and liturgies, without relating one’s pleasing relationship with God should also transcends with wonderful relationship with others. As I wrote, faith leaders too need to mediate how people think about God and others.
But if the citizens also think positively and take part in doing good, at least at personal level, we take some responsibilities in adding positive energy and in creating hope, instead of pointing our fingers to the government and faith leaders only.
Quality comment or not?
1
0
Kaizen #5 & SRossi #8
I agree with you that many socially secularized countries, such as Norway, are doing well economically. Many reports, e.g. Gallup, indicate that only 20 to 25 percent of Norwegians say that religion is important to their life. However, this does not mean that the citizens do not believe in God or do not have any faith traditions and values.
In January 2010, 79.2 percent of 4.799 million population in Norway, were members of the state Church of Norway. And 10 per cent were members of religious and life stance communities outside the Church of Norway. Islam is the second largest religion (Ref: Statistic Norway http://www.ssb.no/trosamf_en/).
While religious rituals are observed in the private space, faith ethical values that naturally converge with basic human rights and dignity are lived-out in the public spheres in many of the socially secular countries. This is not to say that social capital values come from faith alone. Culture, life stance, and many ideologies too are rich with social values.
The question for Malaysia is; if 97% of Malaysians are of faith adherents, why bigotry and corruption are still predominant, and the diversified citizens live on mere tolerance? What happen to religions? Are they not supposed to promote love to God and to others, kindness and goodness?
Perhaps, Malaysia is much more secular than what we think it is, simply because common and important faith values – justice, respect, equality, integrity, love to others – are not the country’s primary values in public spheres as compared to racing with each other by being religious through enforcement of religious laws.
If our current leaders continuously fail to promote and to live-out these social values, and do not take serious action to remedy the content and the pedagogy of Malaysia’s religious and ethics education, the nation will eventually lose its peaceful coexistence. There is high possibility that the future generation will witness many “springs,” many will become unemployed and be deprived from good life.
Quality comment or not?
1
0