By popular demand (according to the comments in the last post which I contributed to New Mandala as “Limpeh”), this blog post is my attempt to review of a few recent sex scandals in Singapore. For those who are unfamiliar with the stories, here is a summary:
In December 2011, the Singapore police busted an online prostitution ring. In the list of customers the polivce discovered that around 10% were senior civil servants. One of them was reportedly the principal of a very popular primary school. He is in his late 30s, married, and had a child. He abruptly quit in the same month, much to the surprise of his staff and parents of students in the school.
Separately, two very senior civil servants – one the head of the Singapore Civil Defence Force (SCDF) and the other the head of the Central Narcotics Bureau (CNB) – were reported by the local media to have been called up for questioning by the Corrupt Practices Investigation Bureau (CPIB) also in December 2011, for having separate sexual relations with the same woman. Their sexual affairs might have compromised the integrity of the procurement of some IT computer systems, because the woman worked for the company which was awarded the IT contract.
Finally, there were substantive rumours that one opposition member of Parliament, Yaw Shin Leong, of the main opposition party, the Workers’ Party, had extra-marital affairs with several women. Yaw decided not to speak out against the rumours and it appears that the Workers’ Party leadership was also kept in the dark about the reality of those rumours. Frustrated by the lack of information from Yaw, the Workers’ Party expelled Yaw in the name of transparency and accountability, thus automatically losing one seat in parliament, triggering a by-election.
*********
How should Singaporeans, and maybe the rest of mainland Southeast Asia, see these sex scandals? The common response might be outrage, followed by puzzlement. What happened to the much-vaunted morals, integrity and non-corruption of our civil service? Why did the Workers’ Party not check the background of Yaw before fielding him for election? Is expelling Yaw, a good move or bad move in the short or long term for the Workers’ Party? Is this really, as the commentator in my previous post described, “an unprecedented period in Singaporean history”?
To be sure, there is definitely some basis for feeling some outrage and puzzlement as described above. Yet to be overly outraged and puzzled is to give too much credit to the myth of “Singaporean integrity”. I call this a myth because I believe that the story of “Singaporean integrity and non-corruption” is part of a hegemonic narrative carefully constructed by the governing Peoples’ Action Party (PAP) over the decades in order to justify and legitimize their political dominance. Put simply, observing that there is no corruption does not mean that there is no corruption. Corruption can be defined differently in different contexts, and can be hidden. If one doesn’t get caught, is it still corruption? If there is an agreement between two parties over the terms and conditions of a contract, is it still corruption?
Furthermore, is there anything innate about the moral fibre of Singaporeans or Singaporean civil servants to render them invincible when faced with sexual temptation? One can certainly expect civil servants to have “higher morals”, but that doesn’t necessarily mean that they will have “higher morals”. The streets and karaoke bars of Geylang, Bras Basah and Selegie, just to name a few areas, are filled with Singaporean uncles and young men looking for temporary sexual trysts with women from mainland Southeast Asia. The Yellow Pages have advertisements for “premium escort services”. That the average Singaporean chooses to ignore them does not mean that they do not exist.
There is a saying among soldiers in the Singapore army: “You can do whatever you want in the army. Just don’t get caught.” Unfortunately, these people were caught.
Elvin Ong is a candidate for the Masters of Philosophy in Politics (Comparative Government) at St Antony’s College, University of Oxford.

Aiyo, next time go to Batam to get that ‘extra’. Nobody cares who you are maaa.
Quality comment or not?
1
4
NB that a byelection hasn’t yet been triggered by YSL’s expulsion. It’s one of the many quirks of Singapore’s quasi-democracy that the Prime Minister has the power to decide if and when byelections will be held. In the meantime the people of Hougang are left without any democratic representation.
Quality comment or not?
1
0
Sounds like shades of the Profumo/Keeler/Rice-Davies affair in the UK early 60′s. Would hardly get a mention now. Is Singapore REALLY that conservative?
Quality comment or not?
1
0
Well said.
Personally, this is the sort of rational and disarming commentary and view that would expose the soft underbelly of the govt.
Too often, local commentators/politicians allow the sly govt party to channel the debate away – in the direction of its choosing.
But, be completely aware that the govt is one that is not above employing Machiavellian methods to get its way.
Quality comment or not?
1
1
Singapore’s longing image cultivation of a clean and immaculate city state is not shattered by these instances. Frequent travellers know about the “darker” side of SP. Remarkable however is the reaction of the caught persons: They step down, or are expelled-simply as that. This is not so common in all OECD countries. The former German President for instance tried to muddle through several accepting advantages affairs while in office and only stepped down after the public prosecution department asked the parliament to revoke his immunity last week. Therefore, I do not see any problems in revealing “scandals” of politicians or public servants as long as these people make the right decision and step down. People are not without fail. And this has to be accepted.
Quality comment or not?
1
0
How the sex scandal is dealt with in the public realm would be really interesting to see. Whether it is dealt with quietly and disappears quickly with public discussions avoided (either by implicit agreement via social taboo or via coercive threat of defamation suit) or whether it becomes raw material for late night standup comedians (or puppet show parodies of politics the way the Nation channel did in Thailand) or raw material for Buddhist moral crusaders (assuming these types exist in Singapore) or whether it becomes a focal point for national shame (maybe westerners will begin to doubt the image of cleanliness and order, litter-free streets & clean public toilets, we have projected to the outside world for decades) and no doubt the independent media will play a role in the scandal’s ultimate fate in the public realm. But thank you Mr. Ong. Having lived in Asia for a long time and having alternated from shock and outrage to just plain confusion at similar things to this sex scandal were handled in the public realm of information, discussion & debate, it is nice to see someone, dissecting it and seeing what makes it tick
Quality comment or not?
0
1
I can’t help but to agree about the predictability and omnipresence of sex scandals, Singapore and elsewhere. But what about the latest string of events surrounding the TR Emeritus publication.
This was an independent magazine which is now facing (seems to have escaped for now) closure and had to retract its stories after alleging nepotism when the Prime Minister’s wife (I believe?) and brother were assigned to high positions in Temasek, the Singaporean national corporation.
Does someone have a good perspective on these issues? It would be nice to hear about them outside of the limited world of the Straits Times or the (now) self-censoring world of TR Emeritus.
Quality comment or not?
0
0
It’s difficult for Singaporean bloggers to get across these issues as they can’t discuss openly issues that have got others into trouble. Nonetheless Alex Au on Yawning Bread and Cherian George on journalism.sg (amongst others) have provided some thoughtful, objective commentary which is worth checking out.
Quality comment or not?
2
0