Photo: Htoo Tay Zar
Since Hillary Clinton’s historic visit to Myanmar, the nation’s reforms have drawn the world’s attention. The end of a half century of military rule leaves Myanmar with countless challenges. Recently, the violence in western Myanmar’s Rakhine State has become a controversial topic. Global bodies, human rights organizations, world leaders and US lawmakers have rushed to condemn what they see as the treatment of these stateless people.
The reality of the history of the Rohingya is not as clear as many believe. A campaign of disinformation has led to denunciation of a policy in Myanmar that at best, is grossly exaggerated, and at worst, does not exist. Headlines have screamed the words “ethnic cleansing and “pogrom.” Myanmar history of secrecy and disregard of human rights under the previous military government has lent credibility to this campaign.
Muslims have been living in Rakhine State (formerly known as Arakan State) for centuries. They share only their faith with the Rohingyas and have coexisted peacefully with Buddhist Rakhines. The term Rohingya describes a people from the origin of Bengali. Much of the violence stems from the questionable arrival and settlement status of these individuals.
The unrest in Rakhine State was sparked by the brutal rape and murder of a Rakhine woman by 3 Muslims, 2 of whom were Rohingya according to eyewitnesses. Retaliation was swift and violent. 9 Muslims were killed by a mob of hundreds of angry residents, presumably native Rakhines.
After days of unrest, Rohingya living in the villages of the district of Maung Taw intensified the violence by burning down homes, banks, hospitals and food stalls. The Myanmar government announced a curfew for the affected area, but the violence on both sides continued. Thousands of Rakhine people have taken refuge at emergency camps; children are unable to attend school; people are not receiving even the most basic medical attention. Rakhines have lost all of their possessions along with their homes and businesses. Many have family members who have been killed.
Despite the hardships endured by both groups, international media have largely ignored the Rakhines while telling story after story about the stateless Rohingyas. Furthermore, International NGOs, including UNHCR who have long provided aid to the Rohingyas, are now providing substantial assistance to the Rohingyas while paying scant attention to the other victims of this violence. In protest, some monks and monasteries have declined to accept INGO support.
Democracy icon Daw Aung San Suu Kyi did speak about the violence, correctly stating that this issue must to be solved by applying a fair standard of rule of law in the affected area and to the Myanmar immigration process. Reformist President U Thein Sein suggested that illegal Rohingya refugees could be handed over to the UNHCR to house them in UN operated refugee camps. Alternatively he suggested that they be absorbed by another state. The UNHCR rejected these proposals despite their concerns about the now stateless inhabitants. Leading Myanmar political figures, including the leadership of 88 Generation Students, agreed that some Rohingya are likely eligible for Myanmar citizenship.
This is an immigration issue, a citizenship issue, a violent disagreement about who exactly is entitled to Myanmar citizenship. The international media have wrongly identified it as a religious clash between Muslims and Buddhists in Myanmar.
The riots started in and spread in towns and villages where the majority population was Rohingya, not native Rakhine. Several Rohingya combatants were rightfully detained by law enforcement authorities due to suspected criminal activity. Human rights groups and many INGO’s have longstanding relationships with the Rohingya populations and relatively little contact with Rakhine populations. Unfortunately NGO’s and Human Rights organizations are as much about raising money as raising awareness. Their accounts, the Rohingya accounts, have been repeated by news agencies, portrayed as fact and not as a one-sided account of Rohingyas and NGO’s who have a natural interest in continuing this narrative. Investigations and interviews of eyewitnesses from all sides would shed light on the situation there.
Photo: Htoo Tay Zar
While Myanmar people of all political and ethnic groups around the world have emphasized that this is not a clash of religions but an immigration issue, media are repeating falsified accounts and culling images from unrelated sources. Photos of Buddhist monks and dead bodies from unrelated events have been misrepresented and splashed across headlines worldwide.
Myanmar is still in the early stages of transformation to democracy. The government, opposition groups and the Myanmar public have to tackle several serious issues. There is violence in Rakhine State, and in violence there are innocent victims on all sides. But there is no ethnic cleansing, no genocide. There are doubtless some longstanding Bengali residents who deserve citizenship, and they should get it. With respect to those who do not qualify, false accusations and refusal to consider reasonable proposals will undoubtedly lead to more violence.
The author is based in Singapore, she covers issues and affairs related to Myanmar on Global Voices and Myanmar Netizens.


Yes, it is not ethnic cleansing but they are killed because they are belonged to different ethnic. Yes, it is not religious conflict but there are hardly any hate propagandas without insulting Islam. No wonder they have been particularly assisted group in the past because they are the only victims in Arakan for two genarations. Now both Rohingya and Rakhines became victims however. Both need care.
Quality comment or not?
0
3
HiChan Myae Khine.
I read your “The conundrum in western Myanmar”
repeatedly.but,I feel shy to read your comclusion that
there is no ethnic cleansing, no genocide inBurma.
You should better study again what means ethnic cleansing and genocide before you issue this kind of verdict.The Arakan origin Rohingyas of Burma are victims of ethnic cleansing and genocide
as defined the meaning and definations of those two words.
Still you are telling the Rohingyas are Bangalee worthy of getting citizenship rights.Study the glorious history of Mrauk-Oo and the Muslim Defenders of Arakan ,the ROHINGYAS, then you may reach to the point of re-correctionof your false claims.
Mohiuddin @ Maung Sein
President
Rohingya Concern International(RCI)
New York , USA
Quality comment or not?
0
3
In deed it was a shame to read an educated guy’s ugly sight blind folded by racism. Yes, this is called racism and you, Chan Myae Khine, are a RACIST, although you are an educated. Once you’re cured, you will find the truth, the rightful name of your so called Bangalees are in fact “Rohingyas”, a true native of Arakan, and you’d find their glorious history and everything else. For educated, it is a shame to conceal the truth; the truth I’m talking about is the fact and real history of Rohingya. I can write whole alot on this, but this much is enough for an educated racist.
Quality comment or not?
0
4
The author said:
“the brutal rape and murder of a Rakhine woman by 3 Muslims, 2 of whom were Rohingya according to eyewitnesses”
First of all, I find it a bit strange that there were “eyewitnesses’ while a rape and murder was committed. Were they just “casually” watching while this brutal crime was happening? Why didn’t they try to intervene and prevent the crime?
Secondly, how can these witnesses say that exactly two of the three were Rohingya? Were the witnesses that close to the crime scene? Anyway, how do you actually tell if someone is a Rohingya?
One has to be careful about “physical” descriptions of alleged criminals. Under the “rule of law” the conviction of criminals has to be decided carefully at a fair trial in a proper court of law (I actually didn’t hear too much in the news about the trial of these criminals).
Since this was the “triggering event” to what happened afterwards, I do blame the authorities for not handling this criminal act with due diligence. The authorities definitely knew that there is tension between the Rakhaings and the Rohingyas and if this brutal rape and murder of a Rakhaing girl has been handled correctly, they might have been able to prevent the subsequent “rule of the mob” (the bus incident) where I believe, innocent Muslims were killed. This in turn led to the savage riots for which both the Rohingyas and the Rakhaings should bear the blame. I don’t care about the exact proportions of how to split the blame. The Burmese government seemingly publicised exact numbers (of the dead and the burnt houses) in a press conference, but how come they know such things so precisely? Were the police and the army people just watching and counting the dead (and the burnt houses) instead of preventing these things from happening. Well, I don’t know for sure.
I agree with the author that a lot of militant Islamic groups are spreading fabricated photos on the Internet, but still this “Rohingya incident” does look like a “tribal warfare”, which doesn’t help Burma’s image internationally, especially in the Muslim countries.
Besides, people from Burma should be very careful about criticising human rights groups (NGO’s, INGO’s, UNHCR etc.) since when it comes to other “oppressed” ethnic groups in Burma that became refugees such as the Karen (mainly in Thailand), the Kachin, the Chin, etc. etc., no one was really complaining about the humanitarian help of the international community People needed them for food, funding and even to get political asylum in some Western country. One cannot turn human rights “on and off” at will or use it just for personal gain! Human Rights is universal (and doesn’t even have to do with citizenship).
I know (and I find it very hypocritical to say the least) that many Burmese, even the other “oppressed ethnic minorities” look down upon Rohingyas as “illegal immigrants from Bangladesh” with no rights. Even if people believe in that, why don’t they blame the porous Burmese borders and the rampant corruption of the Burmese authorities. Besides, no one in Burma is complaining about (not yet at least) about the equally illegal Chinese immigrants (and there are hundreds of thousands of them as well). Isn’t that applying double-standards (both legally and morally speaking).
Unfortunately, Burma has to pay a price for the mistakes and the sins of the military junta over the last 50 years.
Quality comment or not?
1
1
Again Chan M. Khine has proven her either despicable ignorance about the Rohingyas of Burma or as a closet racist working to support the marauding activities of the hateful regime and her racist Buddhists within the Rakhine community. Shame on her and the website for posting such a stupid article in the web to distort history and whitewash crimes of the Myanmar regime, aided by racists and bigots within Burma and Rakhine state.
Quality comment or not?
0
3
Such naivety.
Not so long back John McCain and the equally awful Diane Feinstein were in Myanmar. A few months later there is division and killing that a certain alphabet agency in the US has a 6 million plus track record for around the world.
OK, one more time because the hand wringers just don’t quite get it. Not so long back things weren’t so bad. Then the State Dept and head honcho Americans started to visit Myanmar while snarling at China…now their is killing and division. Anybody notice that China isn’t playing ball on NATO support of Al Qaeda in Syria….just an aside…..
It’s not rocket surgery as we say….
Quality comment or not?
0
1
who is that to write such an shameful article to describe Rohingya as Bangarli. Digest the authentic history of Rohingya to know that Rohingya is the native of Rakhine state. And why NGO help Rohingya is they are most percecuted ethnic minority in the world as they have been torturing by extremist buddhist rakhine and authority.
Quality comment or not?
0
3
Agree with Tocharian comments. So many people were killed just one murder , then what about ten brutal murders by Rakine. Nobody is interested to bring those responsible for killing. Ten muslim pilgrims were killed by Rakine. Bangali … Bangali.. as if Bangali are inferior than Burmese. Rohingya will accept Bangali nationality if they are truely Bangali. But they are not Bangali.
Rohingyas are living in Rakine state like sub- human. Lot of discriminations on them. Restriction on movement, marriage and education etc. Not a single man is working in Police force and arm force. All are Rakine and Buddhist. NGO, UNHCR are not biased. Why should they? Can Rohingya bribe them to be baised for them?. They stand on human right and have chance to see the true life of Rohingya.
Quality comment or not?
1
2
In Southern Thailand Muslims murder and mutilate the bodies of Buddhist monks women and children, in fact pretty much anywhere in the world there is violence with Muslims the Muslims are doing the killing. I am not referring to areas where the US war machine is making money for its stock holders.
Yet Burma is different the posts say, it is the fault of rampaging racist Buddhists attacking pacifist Muslims. I don’t pretend to know the facts but it is pretty hard to swallow this version where all other examples suggest it is probably the Muslims initiating the violence.
Quality comment or not?
3
0
Muslims cannot accept any other religion under sharia law in Myanmar. It means non-believer must be converted if they happen to marry Muslim. (my sister was one of them who being forced to be a muslim. She said ” He promised me I will not be forced to converted, now he broke the promise).
Muslims raping other communities happen in Pakistan, Bangladesh, and many Islamic states. Google it and you will find many. raping non-believers and enslaving them is not a crime in Islamic religion. Read Sura 9. All the peaceful readings in Korun is eliminated by that part alone.
Burmese Muslims who defend Rohingya (aka) Bangali never mention 1942 event nor the Mujahidins from Rakhine state. In 1942, there were many Rakhine villages disappeared due to the genocide initiated by Rohingya Muslims. In 1955, all mujahidins who have been controlling Rakhine state were wiped out by General Ne Win’s military government. Things became quiet for a while!!
After that, Bangladesh Muslims are back under the name “Rohingya”. So,what can we say? we will only say ” this is a sovereign state just as other states” We have a right to create our own law and defend our state and our society. This is a Buddhist state, top of that. However, we are a lot better than Islamic states where non-believers are completely forbidden or being physical abuse (read the latest news from pakistan, 4000 died this year alone). There are minimum 2 millions muslims living all over Myanmar. Many of them are leading business experts occupying central parts of cities. Must go and see the truth instead of arguing by watching news.
Quality comment or not?
4
0
Is New Mandala advocating Thein Sein’s regime?
If Thein Sein allows independent inquiry commission, then according to the result I will accept that whether it was genocide or not.
Now Thein Sein denied the proposal of inquiry.
The author Chan Myae Khine must learn the history of Rohingya before labeling them as Bengali. There are many proofs that Rohingya or Muslims in Arakan existed in Arakan since 8th century. The term “Rooinga” was mentioned in 17th century.
Chan Myae Khine .. get some knowledge first, then write Rohingya issue.
New Mandala .. Please don’t advocate Thein Sein’s regime. You never know how many Rohingyas were killed. Thein Sein denied to allow international commission to access because the regime afraid that the real figure of death toll will find out.
Quality comment or not?
0
4
The clash between civilized and primitive, between barbarity and rationality, between freedom and oppression, between democracy and dictatorship, civilization do not clash but compete. Wafa Sultan explained everything here.. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VqvskXCz-kk&feature=related
Quality comment or not?
1
0
Any conflict, truth dies first and always.
Giving great opportunities for all to write with ample bias. This horrid affair of killing and burning orgy has spawn prolific examples of such writings from all quarters.
Possibly most damaging would be by the “Human Rights” workers and “academics”, indignant at these presumed docile Buddhist Burmese letting them down, coming down harsh and intentially or unintentially labelling the affair as the Burmese Buddhists vs generic Muslim.
Among such writings, this one, second Burma related post in NM since June, came in as Thein Sein promotion service perhaps parallel in the opposite side to that remarkable Sai Latt’s article in bias, misrepresentation and false opinion.
Basic facts are:
http://hlaoo1980.blogspot.co.nz/2012/06/arrakan-boiling-with-anti-islamic-fever.html
28th May- 27 year old Thida Htwe, on the way home from a sewing class at nearby village was robbed of her jewellery, repeated raped and killed violently. Three people were arrested and kept at different police station to avert mob revenge. One of them reportedly hanged himself using his own clothes in custody on the 9th June. On the 18th June the other two were found guilty to rape and murder in a remarkably short court hearing and were given death sentences which in the usual practice were not carried out in Burma.
Leaflets carrying Thida Htwe’s horrific pictures urging for revenge circulated in towns in Arakan before one was put on print in a journal. On the 3rd of June ten Muslim men, eight from central Burma on a religious visit, were dragged out of a bus and killed violently by a mob. No one is yet convicted for it.
After Friday prayers on the 8th June, riot broke out in Maungdaw, a Rohingya majority town. It quickly spread to many towns including the state capital Sittwe with large Rohingya community. Curfew was put on 8th of June in these towns. State of emergency was declared by Thein Sein on the 10th June putting Arakan State under military administration.
New arson and riot with loss of three lives happened on the 8th August with curfew in three more towns.
Now there are visits from news agencies in the area. In Sittwe, Muslim quarters are literally flattened. Rohingya are in camps outside the town with armed forces in between. Buddhists are camped in town mainly at the monasteries.
Boat loads of people crossing overflowing Naaf River to Bangladesh were turned back by armed guards.
Sheikh Hasina, Bangladesh Prime Minister told Al Jazera on the 27th July “It’s Myanmar problem, not Bangladesh’s. I think you should talk to the Myanmar government, not to us on this issue. It’s not our responsibility, right?”
UN envoy VJ Nambier’s visit to the troubled area orchestrated by the military was a non- event.
Perpetual thankless task of Quintana, whose recommendation regularly gathers dust, was unceremoniously and tactlessly condemned by not only Thein Sein but by the whole of “democratic opposition”.
Aung San Suu Kyi has not put forth a single practical way forward of myriads of Burma’ problems in the whole of last year and any hope she might or can do something sensible in this delicate and intricate issue is futile.
If there were any doubt about Thein Sein’s policy, his 11th July meeting with UNHCR head settled it when he most bizarrely offered to pack off the Rohingya anywhere.
All these together with irresponsible generalization by the human rights groups (Buddhist vs Muslim all out war), and rampant evil exploitation by the extremist elements
http://www.groundreport.com/Business/The-unabated-genocide-of-Muslims-in-Burma-and-the-/2947617
paves the ground for further instability and organized opposition and harm against Burmese, in person and their interests as already seen in some parts of Asia.
Quality comment or not?
0
1
Chan Myae Khine’s self description on Global Voices reads: “tiny gal with HUGE dreams.” This New Mandala posting has as much relationship to reality as any dream. She was recently funded to attend a Global Voices meeting in Africa. Are voices like hers the global voices we need to hear?
Quality comment or not?
1
4
Having a dream is not meant that away from reality. Have you heard about Martin Luther King who said “I have a dream”. And when we say voices, why can’t we hear the voices of both sides, U Zaw Win?
Quality comment or not?
5
1
“The international media have wrongly identified it as a religious clash between Muslims and Buddhists in Myanmar.” Wrongly? The Sangha has an opinion on feeding Muslims:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/krystina-friedlander/buddhists-monks-against-humanitarian-aid_b_1711737.html
Quality comment or not?
1
2
And Muslims appear to believe that non-believers must be either converted or culled.
The mullahs/imams have no opinion on other religions? What has the Qur’an to say? Any intention of Muslims living in peace and harmony like good citizens in a multicultural society?
Yangon and Mandalay are full of mosques, some of those in Mandalay nearly as old as the city itself.
Worth looking at Rick Heizman’s “History,Issues and Truth in Arakan/Rakhine State, Western Burma”.
Quality comment or not?
2
0
“You are commenting too quickly. Slow down”.
I’ll be damned if I understand what that means.
Don’t jab the Post Comment? Here we go.
Quality comment or not?
0
0