Laksi Prison, Date 7 January 2013
[Surachai, an important red shirt intellectual, though not popular with many of the intellectual left or right, is perhaps one of the most misunderstood red shirt leader in Thailand. His movement known as Daeng Siam has since (ostensibly) dissolved. He was noted for his entertaining and persuasive rhetorical style on stage during the mass protests. He was arrested under lèse majesté law in Nonthaburi on 22 February 2011, a few days after I first interviewed him. Below are a few summary points from an interview earlier this month. My interest in this interview was to gauge his response towards Yingluck's Pheua Thai Government, which has seemingly refused to offer assistance to him, even though he has pleaded guilty in the court.]
…The Government are not able to do anything as quick as we would like; so we should not blame them. There are three functions of the state: administrative/executive, legislative, and judicial. The government has control only over day-to-day administrative matters. Legislation is regarded as one of the three main functions of government, the administrative branch can act only within the powers and limits set by the law. The elected government cannot intervene in the other branches. Therefore Pheua Thai cannot, no matter how much it wants to under its electoral mandate, be seen to interfere in the other branches.
The amaat regime controls the emplaced senate legislators (post 2006 coup), the Democrat Party and some minor parties in the lower house, and the powerful independent judiciary. Right now the amaat have one powerful weapon remaining: that of the judiciary pursuing the interests of royalists through the court process. We have now in place something of a judicial coup.[1]
Red shirts should be satisfied with what they have achieved to date, having neutralised to some extent some instrumentalities of the amaat regime, and must now start to work together with the elected government on democratic changes. However, they must remain constructively critical, make sure Pheua Thai are not forced into a corner by red shirts where they cannot achieve any progress in achieving reforms. The government is already largely pinned down at each corner by the amaat regime. Right now Pheua Thai is the only hope we have to move democracy forward through elected government; a democratic structure needed in achieving progress.
Surachai said that we should raise hopes on the outcome of any referendum to amend the 2007 military-amaat constitution as this will not be implemented; the amaat will never allow change to its sacrosanct charter. Placing too much hope on this is pointless. The government does not have enough support on consensus-driven politics, either inside or outside Parliament. [2] Pro-democracy groups should be prepared for likely violence as the amaat-Democrat Party alliance looks for any excuse to try to destroy the government.[3]
[On why he pleaded guilty:] Surachai said he knows the government cannot do anything for him as this is a matter of the courts and his stay in prison will likely be until the end of his life. He wants to expose the whole system but he knows it will all take time to change.
[Image source]
[1] Given the failure and lack of credibility of the Democrat Party, the planned action of its orchestrated Yellow/Multi-Coloured Shirt street thugs, and the failure of the army in launching a coup post-2011 election.
[2] At the last Parliamentary session on the second vote to amend the charter even a number of Pheua Thai’s own members abstained from voting due to fear, bribery and coercion.
[3] Red shirts have indicated that there will be street protests by ultra right wing nationalists over the Phra Vihaan if the international court issues it decision in the coming month in favour of Cambodia).

It’s great to see that Surachai is smiling. And also good to hear his analysis of the situation.
Thanks for giving us this, Jim. And since you are in touch with him and maybe others in his situation, like Somyot, like Darunee, please let him know that people like me are thinking of him. And signing petitions here and there and trying to make people aware of the fundamental injustice that has been given him and all the others who are being squashed and silenced.
It’s not much I know. Signing a petition here and there. But it’s what I can do. And I have to hope it helps.
Quality comment or not?
17
3
Tom that’s an old pic NM selected– but he is still smiling (also note: http://thaipoliticalprisoners.wordpress.com/2013/01/27/targeting-surachai/)
Quality comment or not?
2
2
interesting article, and what is said follows most of my own observations/perceptions, too.
Quality comment or not?
2
1
Expatriates who live (or had lived for some years) in Thailand carry a very low opinion of Thailand’s Red Shirt movement; particularly those who were in Bangkok in years 2009-2010 when the Reds were in senseless violent rampage at the behest of their disgraced convicted corrupt leader Thaksin Shinawatra. Red Shirt leaders are inexorably linked to Thaksin . . . past, present and future. My Thai associates simply knowingly smile when I ask them if Thailand’s Red Shirt movement is to further Thailand’s democracy.
Quality comment or not?
13
36
Yes, if a few expatriates have a low opinion of them then obviously they deserve to be locked up. Once they are out of the way, the expatriates can get stuck into serious issues like dual pricing policies.
Quality comment or not?
9
1
Speak for yourself, not other people in generalities, what you are saying may be true about some people, but I can say exactly the opposite and be equally true of the Farangs I know, but The Thais would be a little more vocal in in their reply, and the opposite of your acquaintances.
Quality comment or not?
8
0
I have lived in Thailand for ten years and do not share the opinion of Mr Bennett. To the contrary, I have a very low opinion of the current Yellow Shirt movement. Although it started with broad middle class support in 2006 against the excesses in leadership of Thaksin Shinawatra, it has evolved into a proto-Fascist, anti-democratic, anti-human rights, group of right wing jingoists and dangerous nationalistic warmongers. I will never forgive them for occupying the airports in 2008, or whipping up the masses for war with Cambodia over the Preah Vihar temple complex. I see the Red Shirt movement as a natural reaction to this, and am generally supportive of their motives, although I prefer the elements within the Red Shirt movement who do not identify with the UDD. As for 2009 and 2010, I blame Abhisit and the Army for the violence more than the UDD, especially for the bloodshed in April and May of 2010.
Quality comment or not?
28
6
I’m another farang who has lived more than 10 years in Thailand.I totally share Arthurson’s view.
By the way I would like to express my deep sympathy to Surachai. Very few people can express such a high sense of sacrifice and such a clear and pragmatic analysis of the current situation. I hope this could shake and question the awareness of the Thai youth.
Quality comment or not?
2
0
Having spent much of the past two years attending L-M and CCA trials at San Aya, I can’t agree with Sae Dan’s assessment of ongoing judicial coup.
Indisputably, all judges are amaat but all courts in every country ALWAYS try to ingratiate themselves with their current sitting govt.
The hardline on L-M comes squarely from Puea Thai. After all, Thaksin would never allow himself to be seen as anti-Royal. It is incredible to me that more Reds simply don’t wake up and realise they have been used and discarded. Until, of course, their votes are needed again.
I also must disagree that there exists any separation of powers in Thailand. It’s a big bed and they’re all in it together. Thus, if the legislators blindly refuse to debate the L-M laws despite Constitutional requirement to do so on the basis of citizen petition, the executive makes no noise whatsoever, let alone compel them to do so. The administrative bureaucrats scramble to appear loyal with more censorship and prosecutions and the Constitutional Court makes the unilateral decision, without even consulting the Council of State, that freedom of expression is not protected!
I grieve for the families of Darunee, Tanthawut, Somyot, Surachai not because they are Reds but because they are human and all us humans are programmed to want freedom of expression.
I have called on the previous and the current NHRC to task on some big Royal issues such as transparency over govt censorship and its costs to taxpayers, and to reopen an inquiry into the death of King Ananda…and have not heard from them in well over a year.
As I said, it’s a really big bed!
Quality comment or not?
28
2
You say: “The hardline on L-M comes squarely from Puea Thai.” Now I can agree that PT leadership has hidden from LM change, being scared of the response if they try to do anything. That is spineless, but in politics there is a need for some realism. How many people have been locked up on LM charges that have been laid under this government? How many were laid under the previous government? No tell us again where the hard line is?
Quality comment or not?
5
0
“The hardline on L-M comes squarely from Puea Thai. After all, Thaksin would never allow himself to be seen as anti-Royal (hoping for his amnesty and all that). It is incredible to me that more Reds simply don’t wake up and realise they have been used and discarded.” Well said CJHinke.
“How many times can a man turn his head pretending he doesn’t see? … the answer is blowin in the wind.”
Quality comment or not?
8
2
bennett #4
That is usually the reaction I observe if I bring up a political or socially sensitive subject in Thailand. I interpret this reaction as one of fear,then caution then distrust then smile in an attempt to evaporate your provocative question so the subject may be disregarded and the conversation bought back to harmonious inconsequentialities.
Is that how you interpret it? I think not.
Funnily enough I see Yingluck use the same method in every appearance. It works for her so I don’t expect it to become unfashionable anytime soon.
I feel a new TAT slogan coming on: Thailand:Paradise for Politicians
and here’s a rhetorical question….Do you see any “side” trying to further democracy?
I see warring dynastic factions in a struggle for hearts and minds. T’was ever thus.
Quality comment or not?
4
0
Bennett, comment 4
I broadly share Arthurson’s views after my 12 years in Thailand.
The continuing electoral victories of Thaksin and Thaksin-proxy legislatures (I won’t say governments because I don’t think that Peua Thai has full control over the mechanisms of government i.e. the army) election after election would suggest that the opinions of your expat and Thai associates are not universally shared among either Thais or expats.
I get different opinions. So we probably just mix in different circles.
Having said that, Thaksin’s career of amoral, self-interested opportunism does make CJ Hinke’s analysis very plausible. And he paints a convincing picture of moral cowardice and arse protection that is central to the continuance of laws such as lese majeste.
Quality comment or not?
10
1
Surachai may be a thinker but he is not an intellectual
Anyway, it is a big bed – that’s what makes it so difficult for any well-meaning individual in Thai politics to make and maintain a stand: the majority in the sanctioned (or “rooted”) player alliances is interested in its spot on the bed, not in replacing it with a desk chair.
Quality comment or not?
3
0
Tom Hoy #8
“And he paints a convincing picture of moral cowardice and arse protection that is central to the continuance of laws such as lese majeste.”
…and tragically, any other kind of response is designated “un-thai” by our elders and betters…
Quality comment or not?
3
0
I had a recent very vivid dream of Prime Minister Yingluck with a beard! And in that dream, bearded PM Yingluck was cajoling, bribing and intimidating her reluctant PT party members and an even more animose opposition Democrats to support her resolve to amend Thailand’s Lese Majeste laws.
Attaboy ‘Abe Yingluck! … and then I woke up with my LED monitor still playing that ‘Lincoln’ movie.
If the Yingluck government could not and would not … then maybe let us all just forget it, ok?
Quality comment or not?
1
4
“Surachai may be a thinker but he is not an intellectual” Shan Comment 9.
I am not quite sure what the difference is between an intellectual and a thinker. Smiley face. Does it matter? And i don’t know which of those categories Surachai fits in to. Or Darunee. Or Somyot? Or any other prisoner?
prisons put bodies in prisons. The LM laws put people in prison who are no harm to society.
Quality comment or not?
5
0
Shan
I looked again at your comment and I had no idea what you meant.
Could you make it a little bit clearer?
Quality comment or not?
0
0
Vichai N #11
“Lincoln” has not been released on DVD yet so how come it was on your LCD TV? I’m shocked!
I don’t believe said movie has had a cinema release in Thailand. I wonder why?
I guess after “Abe Lincoln-Vampire Hunter” (popular in Thailand) it wasn’t deemed marketable.
I am sure the dodgy copy you have has been marketed as Abe Lincoln-Vampire Hunter 2
Quality comment or not?
2
0
No I was not watching “Lincoln” from a DVD. I got my “Lincoln” from a flash drive lent by a friend… spanking fresh and the movie was so sharp it’s probably BlueRay version ( … based on the repeating streaming labels, I was probably watching the same copy as the Oscars reviewers!)
Like that movie Lincoln, any parliamentary move to amend or abolish the Thai lese laws must be seen multi-partisan …
At this point, the first step is to get the Thai parliament to openly debate Thai LM laws. At least bearded Thai PM Yingluck could accomplish this first step, please?
Quality comment or not?
4
0
In this context, it might be interesting to know that the King Prajadhipok Institute (KPI) will hold its 15th congress this year under the highly inspiring title, “Royal Good Governance: from Absolutist Royal Good Governance to Democratic Royal Good Governance.” Obviously, one of the key questions at such a conference must be whether lese majeste in general, and the various verdicts (Surachai, Somyot) in particular, should be considered examples of “Democratic Royal Good Governance” or not. I am sure KPI will address these issues frankly, critically, and constructively.
Quality comment or not?
5
0
In appreciation and explanation (if I get it right) of Srithanonchai’s irony (15), “Democratic Royal” is an oxymoron, and “Absolutist Royal” is a tautology. Continuing this logic, “Constitutional Monarchy” is also an oxymoron. It is especially interesting to compare how this fraud of “Constitutional Monarchy” is perpetrated in Europe and in Thailand. European “Constitutional Monarchies” are democracies disguised as a monarchies in order to keep a minority of snobs/crawlers happy. Thai “Constitutional Monarchy” is absolutism disguised as democracy in order to defraud the people. The overthrow of absolutism in Thailand is unfinished business.
Quality comment or not?
8
0
There are some observations on Thai monarchy and the distortion of monarchism in the polemics of Somsak Jeamteerasakul and Sulak Sivalaksa in the programme “Top Jote Prathet Thai” or at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qDSX7m5W5vk
Quality comment or not?
2
0
Yes, This is a classy piece of television, as good as any on the planet. Just a shame that Thailand will now have to return to the fairytale kingdom as the show has taken a bullet to the head. Ironically, the series was called The “Institution of the Monarchy Under the Constitution”. Yeah sure.
Quality comment or not?
6
0